Ninety Years of Perennial Forage Grass Breeding for the Canadian Prairie Provinces
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The majority of Canadian beef production takes place in the three prairie provinces of western Canada and seeded pasture and hay land provides a large proportion of the feed for these cattle. This region is characterized by low to moderate rainfall (300-500 mm annually) and extremely cold winters; thus, forage species grown must have high tolerance to cold and drought. Perennial grass breeding for the region began in 1922 and has continued for ninety years in two programs. Major seeded grass species were introduced into Canada from Eurasia. Significant developments from this program include: the development of Fairway crested wheatgrass (Agropyron cristatum L.) (1932) which was used to revegetate more than 0.5 million ha of eroded land; the introduction and development of improved cultivars of meadow bromegrass (Bromus riparius Rehm.) (1987) which were rapidly adopted by beef producers, making it the most popular grazing species in the prairie provinces; the development of hybrid bromegrass (B. riparius X B. inermis Leyss.) cultivars (2000) which have become popular dual purpose hay/pasture grasses; and the development of green wheatgrass (Elymus hoffmanii K.B. Jensen and K.H. Asay), which is highly tolerant to soil salinity. Recently, there has been increased demand for native Canadian grasses to be used for forage, conservation and reclamation purposes and cultivars or ecological varieties of several species have been released or are under development. Perennial grass cultivars developed in these programs occupy a large portion of the seeded hay and pasture area in the Northern Great Plains region of Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".