MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Functional Anatomy of the Palmaris Brevis: Grasping for Answers

2016· article· en· W2561189096 on OpenAlexafffund
Colin W. Moore, Charles Leslie Rice

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNail Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAnatomyWristThumbForelimbMedicineCadaveric spasmNumerical digitPopulationRetinaculum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction The palmaris brevis (PB) is a small, trapezoid‐shaped muscle found in the human hand and the forelimb of quadruped mammals, originating from the flexor retinaculum to insert in the skin of the medial palm. Although it may be considered a subcutaneous vestigial muscle, the function of the PB has been described as deepening the palm of the hand for grasping, or protecting the neurovasculature of the ulnar canal (Guyon's canal). Although the morphological characteristics of the palmaris brevis have been described through cadaveric dissection, the electromyographic (EMG) activity during hand movements has yet to be explored systematically. Recent clinical case studies investigating PB spasm syndrome reported that this muscle may not be under voluntary control, perhaps suggesting the presence of smooth muscle fibers. Thus, the primary objective of this study was to investigate the EMG activity of the PB during simple hand movements, and secondly to explore, histologically, the presence of smooth muscle fibers in the PB of human cadavers. Methods To date, seven healthy participants (6 males, 1 female; ages: 23–32y) were recruited from the University population to participate in this investigation. Palmaris brevis EMG activity was recorded from the subjects’ dominant hand by inserting a pair of intramuscular fine wires via a small diameter (27.5 gauge) hypodermic needle. Subjects were instructed to forcefully contract their hand muscles to achieve the following movements: abduction of the 5 th digit, finger flexion at the metacarpophalangeal joints, and opposition of the 5 th digit to the thumb. Palmaris brevis reflex activity was tested by compressing the ulnar nerve of right palm at the wrist (as described by Montagu 1952. Science. (115)). Integrated EMG analysis of the PB during the hand positions was measured offline using Spike2 software. For the histological analysis, PB samples were obtained from the hands (3 left, 3 right) of three fresh frozen cadavers (ages: 44–88y). These samples were prepared and stained using a typical H & E staining protocol. Results Histological examination of all six PB specimens revealed no evidence of smooth muscle fibers. Integrated EMG activity of the PB was greatest in all subjects during forceful abduction of the 5 th digit. Opposition of the 5 th digit to the thumb produced less muscle activity than observed during abduction (Mean: 59 ± 24% of abduction EMG activity). No measureable PB muscle activity was elicited during the simple finger flexion task in all participants. A palmaris brevis reflex producing dimpling of the skin and EMG activity could be elicited in ~60% of the subjects. Conclusions The proposed protective function of the PB in relation to the ulnar canal is supported by the observation that the EMG activity was greatest during abduction. Movements in which the hand is pressed against a flat surface, such as a push‐up exercise, would rely on abduction of the 5 th digit in order to stabilize and support the hand. As the PB contracts, it provides a protective muscular barrier to the underlying neurovasculature of the ulnar canal. EMG activity recorded during opposition demonstrates the PB provides protection to the ulnar canal neurovasculature during grasping motions such as a cyclist holding their handlebars. Histological evidence demonstrates that the PB is composed of skeletal muscle fibers and can be voluntarily activated during specific hand movements; however, the muscle cannot be contracted in isolation. Support or Funding Information Supported By NSERC

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicNail Diseases and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207