MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Direct and Enhanced Cytotoxicity of the Bcl-2 Family Inhibitor GX15-070 on Rituximab-Sensitive and Rituximab-Resistant B-NHL Clones.

2007· article· en· W2561216302 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Melisa Martinez-Paniagua, Mario I. Vega, Sara Huerta‐Yépez, Bernardo Martínez-Miguel, Rogélio Hernández‐Pando, César González-Bonilla, Benjamin Bonavida

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCell death mechanisms and regulation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCytostasisApoptosisCHOPRituximabCancer researchBcl-2 familyXIAPRaji cellCytotoxicityPharmacologyVincristineBiologyCaspaseChemistryLymphomaImmunologyProgrammed cell deathBiochemistryChemotherapyCyclophosphamide

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Rituximab (chimeric anti-CD20 mAb) has been used for the treatment of Non Hodgkin B cell lymphomas (B-NHL), alone or in combination with CHOP. However, a subset of patients does not respond to treatment or develops refractoriness to further treatments. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop new alternatives to treat these patients. We have reported that treatment of B-NHL cell lines with rituximab inhibits anti-apoptotic survival pathways and down regulates the expression of anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 family proteins (i.e. Bcl-2/Bcl-xl) resulting in sensitization to chemotherapeutic drugs. Further, rituximab-resistant clones showed over-expression of anti-apoptotic gene products (Jazirehi et al., Cancer Research1:1270–81, 2007). Therefore, we hypothesize that inhibitors of anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 family may reverse the resistance to apoptotic stimuli. We examined chemical inhibitors that mimic natural ligands of the anti-apoptotic BH3-only proteins. GX15–070 (Gemin X Biotechnologies, Inc., Canada) inhibits Bcl-2 protein-protein interactions resulting in Bak and Bax oligomerization, release of cytochrome C, and activation of caspases (Shore and Viallet, Hematology, 2005; ASH, 226–230). Treatment of B-NHL cell lines (Raji, Ramos, 2F7, DHL-4) with subtoxic concentrations of GX15–070 (20–50 uM) resulted in inhibition of cell proliferation and subsequently induction of apoptosis as determined by TUNEL. There was a time and concentration-dependent effect of GX15–070 on cytostasis and apoptosis. Analysis of cells treated with GX15–070 by western blotting revealed that Bcl-2, Bcl-xl, and Mcl-1 protein expressions were significantly inhibited as compared to controls. The protein inhibition by GX15–070 was not expected and needs further investigation. We also examined the effect of combination treatment of GX15–070 with the chemotherapeutic drug CDDP and there was an additive or synergistic cytotoxic effect. Treatment of rituximab-resistant clones (generated from 2F7, Raji and Ramos) treated with GX15–070 resulted in significant inhibition of cell growth and apoptosis. The cytotoxicity of GX15–070 in the B-NHL cell lines was tumor specific, because treatment of human peripheral blood leukocytes from different donors did not show any cytotoxic effect. Likewise, treatment of nude mice with different concentrations of GX15–070 did not show any detectable toxicity. These findings demonstrate that GX15–070 is cytotoxic to various drug/rituximab-resistant B-NHL cell lines and is not toxic to normal human leukocytes. This study suggests that combination of GX15–070 with subtoxic concentrations of chemotherapeutic drugs may have additive/synergistic effects. The present findings support the potential therapeutic application of GX15–070 in the treatment of patients with B-NHL that are resistant to current therapies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicCell death mechanisms and regulation→French-language works237,207→