MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2561366290 · doi:10.1109/lpt.2016.2647261

Dual-frequency Optoelectronic Oscillator for Thermal-Insensitive Interrogation of a FBG Strain Sensor

2017· article· en· W2561366290 on OpenAlexafffund
Ou Xu, Jiejun Zhang, Hong Deng, Jianping Yao

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Photonics Technology Letters · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Fiber Optic Sensors
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaChina Scholarship Council
KeywordsFiber Bragg gratingMaterials scienceMicrowaveOpticsFrequency modulationOptoelectronicsModulation (music)Optical filterBeat (acoustics)Center frequencyPhase modulationIntensity modulationRadio frequencyPhysicsPhase noiseBand-pass filterAcousticsTelecommunicationsWavelength

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose and experimentally demonstrate an approach to perform high-speed and high-resolution thermal-insensitive interrogation of a fiber Bragg grating (FBG) strain sensor based on a dual-frequency optoelectronic oscillator (OEO). Two phase-shifted FBGs (PSFBGs) are incorporated in the OEO loop to implement a microwave photonic filter with two passbands based on phase modulation and phase-modulation to intensity-modulation conversion, to generate two microwave signals with their frequencies determined by the center frequencies of the two passbands. When one of the PSFBG is experiencing a strain, a beat frequency between the two microwave signals that is linearly proportional to the strain applied to the sensing PSFBG is obtained. By monitoring the beat frequency using a digital signal processor, the strain is measured. The proposed approach is experimentally demonstrated. High-resolution sensing with a resolution of $0.83~\mu \varepsilon $ that is thermal insensitive is demonstrated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations53
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Photonics Technology LettersSame topicAdvanced Fiber Optic SensorsFrench-language works237,207