MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2561433394

THE QUARTER-LIFE CRISIS EXPERIENCED BY MEGAN IN LYNN SHELTON’S LAGGIES

2016· article· en· W2561433394 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Atika Nur Hidayah

Bibliographic record

VenueLANTERN:Journal on English Language, Culture and Literature · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLiterary Theory and Cultural Hermeneutics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)NarrativeCharacter (mathematics)PsychologyIdentity crisisConfusionPsychoanalysisHistoryArtLiterature
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Laggies (2014) is an independent movie directed by young director Lynn Shelton and writer Andrea Siegel. Laggies tells the story of Megan who experiences quarter-life crisis. Quarterlife crisis is a period of constant change, instability, and identity confusion. It hits young adult in the age of early 20s until early 30s where the adolescence transforms into the adulthood. In the movie Laggies, the main character, Megan suffers from quarter-life crisis in which she is in her mid-20s but she does not know what she wants to do for her future. In this thesis, the writer will describe the intrinsic aspects, which are narrative and cinematography elements and extrinsic aspect of the movie which is the quarter-life crisis experienced by the character. The objective of this study is to explain the quarter-life crisis experienced by the character in the movie Laggies. The method used in collecting the data is library research while the approach used is exponential approach to describe the intrinsic aspects and social psychological approach to describe the extrinsic aspects. The result of this thesis is that Megan in the movie Laggies has finally overcome her quarter-life crisis and lived according to her interest and values of life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.641
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLANTERN:Journal on English Language, Culture and LiteratureSame topicLiterary Theory and Cultural HermeneuticsFrench-language works237,207