MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2561435075 · doi:10.1016/s1525-0016(16)33938-7

329. Identifying Pharmacological Enhancers of Adenoviral Vector Replication and Transgene Expression

2015· article· en· W2561435075 on OpenAlexaff
Briti Saha, Jean‐Simon Diallo, Robin J. Parks

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Therapy · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicVirus-based gene therapy research
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransgeneEnhancerVector (molecular biology)BiologyReplication (statistics)Viral vectorCell biologyComputational biologyVirologyGeneticsMolecular biologyGene expressionGeneRecombinant DNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Adenovirus (Ad) vectors are currently the most commonly used vehicle for therapeutic gene delivery in human gene therapy, and oncolytic Ad-based gene therapy has shown promise in several types of cancer. We are interested in identifying compounds that enhance or inhibit Ad gene expression and replication.We have designed a novel Ad vector containing the RFP gene within the late transcription unit. Thus, the level of RFP expression correlates to the extent of virus replication. We have also validated a high-throughput system for screening small molecules using this vector. The anticancer chemotherapy drug vorinostat was initially expected to increase gene expression from the vector since it is a pan-histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACI), and HDACIs have been shown to increase Ad transgene expression. However, our assays show that vorinostat significantly delays the onset of vector replication and transgene expression, and that these effects may be specific to the inhibition of class I HDACs. We are currently working on elucidating the mechanism by determining the role of specific class I HDACs and the downstream effects of HDAC-activity loss. Consequences of HDAC inhibition on vector replication and transgene expression will also be studied in vivo. In the future, we will use our Ad construct to screen small-molecule libraries and identify novel enhancers of these processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.521

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular TherapySame topicVirus-based gene therapy researchFrench-language works237,207