Baseline Demographics and Disease Characteristics of Patients with Hypereosinophilic Syndrome in a Placebo-Controlled Trial Evaluating the Steroid-Sparing Effects of the Anti-IL-5 Monoclonal Antibody, Mepolizumab.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Mepolizumab is a humanized anti-IL-5 monoclonal antibody that blocks the actions of IL-5, the hematopoietin most responsible for eosinophil production, differentiation, and survival. Clinical experience in small numbers of patients with hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES), asthma, and atopic dermatitis indicated that intravenous (IV) mepolizumab therapy was associated with a reduction in blood eosinophils and was well-tolerated. A multicenter (26 sites worldwide), randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, and parallel-group trial has been conducted to evaluate the steroid-sparing effects of mepolizumab in patients with HES, and its efficacy and safety in controlling the signs and symptoms of this disease. The trial recruited patients 18–85 years of age with HES (blood eosinophil count >1500/μl for ≥6 months with evidence of eosinophilia-related organ involvement or dysfunction, without any known cause of eosinophilia), who tested negative for the FIP1L1-PDGFRα gene rearrangement and required 20–60 mg/day prednisone (monotherapy) to maintain blood eosinophils at <1000 cells/μL during a stabilization period of up to 6 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with disease control on ≤ 10 mg/day prednisone for ≥8 consecutive weeks during the 36-week treatment period. Here we report the baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of trial participants who comprise the largest HES population without the FIP1L1-PDGFRα mutation evaluated to date. Moreover, the clinical spectrum of HES in this population encompassed the multiple varieties of HES currently recognized. Of 107 patients screened, 85 were enrolled, 43 were randomized to mepolizumab (750 mg IV every 4 weeks), and 42 to placebo (saline IV every 4 weeks). No major differences in demographic and disease characteristics were observed between the treatment groups (Table). Many patients (60%) had previously tried and discontinued an HES therapy, notably imatinib mesylate (38%), interferon-α (21%), or hydroxyurea (21%). The most prevalent HES-related medical conditions at baseline were skin (47%) and respiratory (41%) disorders. The primary endpoint was significant in favor of mepolizumab treatment, thus providing evidence that this agent will offer clinical benefits in terms of steroid reduction/sparing in HES. Patient demographics Placebo (n=42) Mepolizumab (n=43) Total (n=85) Age, y (mean±SD) 49.1±14.4 47.0±16.2 48.1±15.3 Men, % 17 (40%) 26 (60%) 43 (51%) Caucasian, % 34 (81%) 38 (88%) 72 (85%) Weight, kg (mean±SD) 79.7±18.3 80.9±22.2 80.3±20.3 BMI, kg/m2 (mean±SD) 27.8±5.8 27.0±6.4 27.4±6.1 Baseline prednisone≤30 mg, n (%) 30 (71%) 30 (70%) 60 (71%) Baseline prednisone >30 mg, n (%) 12 (29%) 13 (30%) 25 (29%) Previously treated for HES, n (%) 40 (95%) 41 (95%) 81 (95%) HES duration, y (mean±SD) 6.5±9.5 4.3±5.6 5.4±7.8 Age at HES onset, y (mean±SD) 42.7±16.2 42.7±17.7 42.7±16.9
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".