MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2561656365 · doi:10.1515/ohs-2015-0027

Decomposition study of in vivo phytoplankton absorption spectra aimed at identifying the pigments and the phytoplankton group in complex case 2 coastal waters of the Arabian Sea

2015· article· en· W2561656365 on OpenAlexaff
S.S. Shaju, P. Minu, Ajit Srikanth, P. Muhamed Ashraf, Anil Kumar Vijayan, B. Meenakumari

Bibliographic record

VenueOceanological and Hydrobiological Studies · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal ecosystems
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhytoplanktonFucoxanthinChlorophyll aSeawaterAbsorption (acoustics)PigmentEnvironmental chemistryOceanographyColored dissolved organic matterChemistryBiologyBotanyEcologyMaterials scienceGeologyNutrientOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Phytoplankton modify the optical properties of the seawater by altering the subsurface light field. Information on the accessory pigments present in the phytoplankton helps to differentiate major phytoplankton classes or taxonomic groups. The variability in the absorption spectra of phytoplankton and particulate matter of case 2 coastal waters of the Southeastern Arabian Sea were studied from June 2010 to November 2011. The phytoplankton specific absorption coefficient, at 440 nm and 675 nm, a* ph (440) and a* ph (675) varied from 0.018 to 0.32 m 2 mg -1 and from 0.0005 to 0.16 m 2 mg -1 , respectively. The 4 th derivative spectra computed for each in vivo absorption spectrum showed that the amplitude of maxima obtained is proportional to the concentration of the chromoprotein which absorbed that wavelength. Regression of pigment concentration against the 4 th derivative spectral coefficient showed that the measurements of particulate absorption could provide quantitative information on chlorophyll α and other accessory pigment concentrations. Fucoxanthin and diadinoxanthin, the carotenoid pigments found in the diatoms were identified from the derivatives peaks. The study demonstrates the utility of using the 4 th derivative analysis as a tool to identify the dominating phytoplankton group and its pigment composition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.980

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOceanological and Hydrobiological StudiesSame topicMarine and coastal ecosystemsFrench-language works237,207