Bibliographic record
Abstract
Thierry PCOUT Les travaux de Michel Hbert ont largement renouvel l'histoire des institutions comptables de Provence, et tout particulirement la gense de la Chambre des comptes 1 . Bien avant que la mode n'en saisisse la communaut scientifique en France, il s'adonnait l'interrogation des formes de l'crit pragmatique, dans une perspective d'histoire institutionnelle et des pratiques de gouvernement, et lanait nombre de travaux sur ce chantier 2 . Il est l'un des dcouvreurs du registre de clavaire comme source de l'histoire de la construction de l'tat angevin en Provence, un filon qu'il appartint Jean-Luc Bonnaud de faire fructifier 3 . Avant eux, Rodrigue Lavoie avait ouvert le chemin, mais ce type de document tait alors utilis comme une ressource de l'histoire sociale et non comme un objet en soi 4 . Le tournant du XIV e sicle marque en effet un seuil essentiel dans l'institutionnalisation du contrle des comptes, dans le prolongement des statuts et ordonnances de 1288 et 1297. Dsormais dote d'un personnel autonome, de procdures et protocoles spcifiques, la Provence angevine adopte prcocement des mthodes appeles durer. Parmi les nombreux documents de la Chambre des comptes de Provence qui nous sont parvenus, un registre prsente la particularit d'avoir t 1 L'cole qubcoise d'histoire provenale a trouv en Michel l'un de ses principaux matres.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.030 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".