Bibliographic record
Abstract
Auditory and Visual Continuity Perception: A Unifying Theory Leah M. Knightly ( leah@psych.ucla.edu ) UCLA Department of Psychology; Box 951563 Los Angeles, CA 90095-1563 USA Introduction Researchers in the field of auditory and visual perception have been intrigued by our ability to unify partially occluded objects (Shipley & Kellman, 1992; Kellman & Shipley, 1991) and partially masked sounds (Dannenbring, 1976; Ciocca & Bregman, 1987). In vision, an object may be partially occluded by another object yet we may perceive the object as continuing behind the occluder. In audition, sounds may be partially masked by another sound, yet we may hear the sound as continuing through the mask. Though these phenomena are considered to be analogous (Bregman, 1990), separate theories exist to predict the conditions under which continuity perception occurs in vision (Relatability Theory - Kellman & Shipley, 1991) and audition (Frequency Proximity and Trajectory principle - Ciocca & Bregman, 1987). The purpose of this paper is to propose that the conditions under which continuity perception occurs for edges and tones may be predicted by one theory. This theory, introduced here and inspired by Relatability Theory, is called “Continuity Theory Audio- Visual (AV).” Continuity Theory (AV) Continuity Theory (AV) predicts that a partially occluded stimulus will be perceived as continuing behind an obstruction if the linear extensions of the stimulus on either side of the obstruction meet within the bounds of the obstruction. For the visual domain, this means that an edge partially covered by an occluder will be perceived as continuing behind the occluder if the linear extensions of the edges meet within the area occupied by the occluder. For the auditory domain, this means that a tone partially masked by a noise burst will be perceived as continuing through the noise burst if the linear extensions of the pre and post-noise frequencies meet within the duration of the mask. Evidence that Continuity Theory (AV) can predict the conditions under which edges and tones are perceived as continuous is provided through a critical analysis of the results obtained in two studies – Shipley & Kellman (1992) on unit formation in vision and Ciocca & Bregman (1987) on perception of tones through noise. In Shipley & Kellman (1992) participants perceived partially occluded figures as unified if the linear extensions of their edges met within the bounds of relatability (see Kellman & Shipley, 1991 for details). In Ciocca & Bregman (1987) listeners perceived sounds as continuing through a burst of noise depending on the frequency and trajectory (i.e. linear extension) of the pre and post-noise tones. Close examination of the results from these two studies reveals that one theory is sufficient to describe the conditions under which continuity perception occurred. This theory is Continuity Theory (AV). The advantage of the theory is it can account for the results obtained in vision and audition. In addition, the theory includes size/duration of the occluder/mask as a factor in unit formation, a variable not incorporated in other theories of continuity (Kellman & Shipley, 1992; Ciocca & Bregman, 1987) yet considered to be important in continuity perception (Vicario, 1982). Future Directions In summary, Continuity Theory (AV) provides a simple and general cross-modal rule that predicts continuity perception for those conditions tested in Shipley & Kellman (1992) and Ciocca & Bregman (1987). Future work should involve testing Continuity Theory (AV) for those conditions not examined in Shipley & Kellman (1992) (i.e. when linear extensions meet at an angle 90°). References Bregman, A. S. (1990). Auditory Scene Analysis: The Perceptual Organization of Sound. Cambridge. MA: The MIT Press. Ciocca, V. & Bregman, A. S. (1987). Perceived continuity of gliding and steady-state tones through interrupting noise. Perception and Psychophysics, 42 (5), 476-484. Dannenbring, G. L. Perceived auditory continuity with alternately rising and falling frequency transitions. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1976 Jun, v30 (n2):99- Kellman, P. J. & Shipley, T. F. (1991). A theory of visual interpolation in object perception. Cognitive Psychology, Shipley, T. F. & Kellman, P. J. (1992). Perception of partly occluded objects and illusory figures: Evidence for an identity hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18 (1), 106-120. Vicario, Giovanni, B. (1982). Some observations in the Auditory Field. In J. Beck, Organization and Representation in Perception (pp. 269-283). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.016 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".