Combination Therapy with Rituximab and Fludarabine in Waldenstrom’s Macroglobulinemia.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Rituximab and Fludarabine are active in Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia (WM) producing major response rates of 40–70%. Both pre-clinical and clinical studies in related low-grade B-cell malignancies suggest that additive, and even synergistic benefit with combination Fludarabine and Rituximab may result. As such, we conducted this combination study with Rituximab and Fludarabine in WM patients. WM patients who had received < 2 prior therapies, and who had not previously been treated with any nucleoside analogue or Rituximab were eligible. Intended therapy was as follows: Weeks 1–4 Rituximab (375 mg/m2/week) Weeks 5, 9, 13 Fludarabine daily for 5 days (25 mg/m2) Weeks 17, 18 Rituximab (375 mg/m2/week) Weeks 19, 23, 27 Fludarabine daily for 5 days (25 mg/m2) Week 30, 31 Rituximab (375 mg/m2/week) Patients were evaluated at week 12, and if they did not progress were eligible for further therapy and were evaluable for response. 43 WM patients were enrolled with a median age of 61 (range 52–75 yrs), and median prior therapies of 1 (range 0–2). 40/43 patients continued on therapy beyond week 12. Two patients (1 PR, 1 SD) died after completing protocol therapy including one elderly patient who had an influenza pneumonia and another debilitated patient who may have had a secondary malignancy. Delays in therapy due to neutropenia were common, and 58% of patients experienced Grade III/IV neutropenia. Protocol therapy was truncated after the 4th and 5th courses of fludarabine in several patients for persistent neutropenia and/or thrombocytopenia despite delays in therapy and/or use of G-CSF support. Other complications included: Herpes zoster outbreak in 3 of the first 21 patients, before prophylactic acyclovir or equivalent was initiated; parasthesias (n=3); pneumonitis (n=2); development of bladder cancer (n=1) and a high grade lymphoma (n=1); subdural hemorrhage in a patient who had a 3-fold increase in serum viscosity following the first 4 infusions of Rituximab. On an intent to treat basis, 39/43 (90.1%) patients demonstrated a response. Response categories were as follows: CR (n=3); PR (n=32); MR (n=4). One patient remains in stable disease at 20+ months. At a median follow-up of 17 months, 36 of 39 responding patients remain in remission. Rituximab in combination with fludarabine is highly active and produces durable responses in WM.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".