MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2562437966 · doi:10.17986/blm.2016323747

Demirjian Metodu Farklı Ülkelerde Yaş Tayininde Kullanılabilir mi?

2016· article· en· W2562437966 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Zehtiye Füsun Yaşar, Erhan Büken, Mustafa Agâh Tekindal

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Bulletin of Legal Medicine · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicForensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGynecologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: The aim of this study is to discuss the reliability and utility of Demirjian method used at calculating dental age determination with the help of using the data of other countries.Materials and Methods: The data of 22 studies, in which dental age determination was done by Demirjian method between the age of 7 - 11 age range from different countries or different regions from the same country, was examined. The inclusion standard in the studies was defined as this study; examining on healthy children, using panoramic films, researching on left bottom mandibular seven teeth. Data belong to girls and boys at the age range of 7-11 and data related with their chronological age and dental ages defined by Demirjian method was organized in tabular and the differences between dental age and chronological age were evaluated. After variance analysis at the factorial order in the data analysis, Bonferroni test was used for multiple comparisons. Type 1 error was pegged at 0,05 (α=0,05).Results: As a result of assessments, from the point of dental age designated by Demirjian method and chronological age, a difference has been detected between the children who live at different countries and live at different regions of the same country. Negative and positive differences has been detected with regards to the utility of Demirjian method by the samples taken from Netherlands, Turkey, Sudan, China, Serbia, Italy, Pakistan, New Zealand, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Malaysia and India. The difference between the results of the Belgian children who live in Romania, Iran, India and children who live in other societies were not that meaningful.Conclusion: Juvenescence and development at children differ from person to person and society to society because of reasons such as heritage, gender, hormones, nutrition, socio-cultural and environmental factors and previous diseases. Development of teeth are under the influence of familiar factors and because of this reason when scoring system in order to designate dental age of French-Canadian origin children, applied to different societies, important differences could be seen between chronological age and dental age. In order to overcome this difference, this method needs modification according to the social features.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.889
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.037
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Bulletin of Legal MedicineSame topicForensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology StudiesFrench-language works237,207