CRYSTALLINE RETINOPATHY AND RETINAL VASCULOPATHY IN CALCIFIC UREMIC ARTERIOLOPATHY (CALCIPHYLAXIS)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To report the posterior segment and retinal vascular manifestations of calcific uremic arteriolopathy (calciphylaxis). Clinical findings are correlated with multimodal imaging results. METHODS: Observational case report. RESULTS: A 65-year-old white woman on hemodialysis was referred for assessment of poor vision bilaterally. Clinical examination demonstrated a crystalline retinopathy with stigma of previous retinal arterial occlusion. Fluorescein angiography revealed delayed retinal arterial filling bilaterally, sheathing of vessels, and peripheral nonperfusion. The crystals were hyperautofluorescent. Spectral domain and enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography localized the crystals within the retina with a predilection for the retinal arterial vasculature. The choriocapillaris was not involved. Two years prior, the patient developed necrotic skin lesions which were biopsied and confirmed the diagnosis of calciphylaxis. CONCLUSION: Calcific uremic arteriolopathy is an extremely rare cause of thrombogenic microangiopathy in end-stage renal disease patients. Retinal arterial occlusion appears to be a rare but significant cause of visual loss in this disease and is likely to be consequent to crystalline deposition in the retinal vasculature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".