Carbon Dioxide Switchable Polymers and Processes in Polymer Reaction Engineering
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary We have prepared a variety of polymer nanoparticles with surface properties that can be switched from charged to uncharged using only carbon dioxide and air as triggers. Our initial approach to designing these materials relied on using pre‐made “switchable surfactants” via emulsion polymerization. This approach is similar to that employed to make the majority of polymer latexes used in commercial applications. We then refined the process further to address a shortcoming of many emulsion polymers, that of surfactant migration due to the stabilizing species not being covalently bound, by developing variants of surfactant free processes for making carbon dioxide switchable polymer colloids: (1) using only a carbon dioxide switchable initiator; (2) using a carbon dioxide switchable comonomer which is copolymerized in situ to generate the stabilizing species; and (3) using living radical polymerization to prepare nanoparticles via a Polymerization Induced Self Assembly (PISA) process. In all of these cases, the stabilizing moieties are covalently bound to the particle surface.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".