MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2563147542

Using Physical and Social Sensors in Real-Time Data Streaming for Natural Hazard Monitoring and Response

2016· article· en· W2563147542 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Yelena Kropivnitskaya

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarship@Western (Western University) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Visualization and Analytics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitacsInstitute for Catastrophic Loss Reduction
KeywordsNatural (archaeology)Computer scienceHazardNatural hazardReal-time computingEnvironmental scienceGeographyMeteorologyChemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Technological breakthroughs in computing over the last few decades have resulted in important advances in natural hazards analysis. In particular, integration of a wide variety of information sources, including observations from spatially-referenced physical sensors and new social media sources, enables better estimates of real-time hazard. The main goal of this work is to utilize innovative streaming algorithms for improved real-time seismic hazard analysis by integrating different data sources and processing tools into cloud applications. In streaming algorithms, a sequence of items from physical and social sensors can be processed in as little as one pass with no need to store the data locally. Massive data volumes can be analyzed in near-real time with reasonable limits on storage space, an important advantage for natural hazard analysis.\nSeismic hazard maps are used by policymakers to set earthquake resistant construction standards, by insurance companies to set insurance rates and by civil engineers to estimate stability and damage potential. This research first focuses on improving probabilistic seismic hazard map production. The result is a series of maps for different frequency bands at significantly increased resolution with much lower latency time that includes a range of high-resolution sensitivity tests.\nSecond, a method is developed for real-time earthquake intensity estimation using joint streaming analysis from physical and social sensors. Automatically calculated intensity estimates from physical sensors such as seismometers use empirical relationships between ground motion and intensity, while those from social sensors employ questionaries that evaluate ground shaking levels based on personal observations. Neither is always sufficiently precise and/or timely. Results demonstrate that joint processing can significantly reduce the response time to a damaging earthquake and estimate preliminary intensity levels during the first ten minutes after an event. The combination of social media and network sensor data, in conjunction with innovative computing algorithms, provides a new paradigm for real-time earthquake detection, facilitating rapid and inexpensive risk reduction. In particular, streaming algorithms are an efficient method that addresses three major problems in hazard estimation by improving resolution, decreasing processing latency to near real-time standards and providing more accurate results through the integration of multiple data sets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score0.635

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.169
GPT teacher head0.386
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholarship@Western (Western University)Same topicData Visualization and AnalyticsFrench-language works237,207