MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Membrane Type-Matrix Metalloproteinases (MT-MMPs) Are Expressed in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Cells and Are Upregulated by TNF-α.

2007· article· en· W2563147873 on OpenAlexaff
Neeta Shirvaikar, Ali Jalili, Sara Ilnitsky, Loree Larratt, Imran Mirza, Anna Janowska‐Wieczorek

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtease and Inhibitor Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsCanadian Blood ServicesUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMatrix metalloproteinaseJurkat cellsCell cultureU937 cellMyeloidMyeloid leukemiaBiologyCancer researchBlotCellMolecular biologyChemistryImmunologyT cellBiochemistryGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Membrane type-matrix metalloproteinases (MT-MMPs) play a key role in tumor cell progression and metastasis but their role in hematological malignancy and leukemic cell dissemination is still unclear. To date, six MT-MMPs have been identified, of which four (MT1-, MT2-, MT3- and MT5-MMP) possess a trans-membrane domain that tethers the enzyme to the plasma membrane and two (MT4- and MT6-MMP) are anchored to the cell surface via a glycophosphatidyl inositol domain. MT-MMPs are known to activate pro-forms of MMPs. We examined the expression of all six MT-MMPs in 13 myeloid and lymphoid cell lines using RT-PCR, Western blotting and FACS. We found that MT1-MMP was expressed on most of the cell lines tested, MT2-MMP was expressed in myeloid cell lines such as THP-1, HEL, K562 and U937, and in T cell lines such as Jurkat and CEM, but not in any of the tested B cell lines, MT3-MMP was not expressed in any of the cell lines except for THP-1, MT4-MMP was strongly expressed in all myeloid but not lymphoid cell lines and MT5-MMP and MT6-MMP were expressed in most of the myeloid cell lines. Next, we examined the expression of all six MT-MMPs in primary AML samples and found that MT1-MMP is expressed in 20 out of 24 AML patient samples as detected by RT-PCR and Western blotting, MT2-MMP and MT4-MMP were expressed in 21 and 22 out of 24 samples, respectively, and MT6-MMP was expressed in 17 out of the 17 samples tested. In contrast, MT3- and MT5-MMPs were not found in the primary AML samples. Zymographic analysis showed that the pro form of MMP-2 was secreted in media conditioned by AML blasts and became activated only when these AML blasts were co-cultured with BM stromal cells. Since TNF-α is endogenously secreted by AML blasts we next stimulated these cells with human recombinant TNF-α and found strong upregulation of MT1-MMP and MT6-MMP. Moreover, zymography demonstrated that TNF-α-stimulated AML blasts are more potent in activation of pro-MMP-2 than unstimulated cells, indicating that activation may occur via upregulation of MT-MMPs. Furthermore, we found that TNF-α stimulation led to stronger upregulation/induction of MT1- and MT2-MMPs in CD34+ cells than in CD34- cells isolated from AML patients. In conclusion, we report here for the first time that MT1-, 2-, 4- and 6-MMPs are expressed in AML blasts and suggest that these MT-MMPs may contribute to the invasive phenotype of this malignancy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicProtease and Inhibitor MechanismsFrench-language works237,207