Prenatal diagnosis and prognosis of accelerated idioventricular rhythm
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: As postnatal identification of accelerated idioventricular rhythm (AIVR) relies on specific electrocardiographic patterns, prenatal diagnosis of this condition is challenging and its true incidence is unknown. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the performance of prenatal ultrasonography in identifying intrauterine cardiocirculatory events linked to specific electrocardiographic signs of postnatal AIVR, including left or right ventricular origin, and to assess the prenatal prognosis of this arrhythmia. METHODS: We reviewed Doppler tracings from the superior vena cava/ascending aorta (SVC/Ao), ductus venosus (DV), ductus arteriosus (DA) and aortic isthmus (AoI), as well as simultaneous M-mode recordings of septal and left ventricular wall motions of fetuses diagnosed with AIVR from January 2004 to December 2014. RESULTS: Three cases of AIVR were identified among 27 912 fetuses. SVC/Ao Doppler flow recordings revealed atrioventricular dissociation (ventricular rates within 20% of atrial rates) in all three fetuses and episodes of isorhythmic atrioventricular dissociation in one, while M-mode confirmed normal left ventricular shortening fraction in all cases. Fusion beats were observed on AoI tracing in one fetus, while simultaneous recordings of AoI and DA revealed signs of right bundle branch block in one case and left bundle branch block in the other two. On DV Doppler recordings, retrograde a-waves in the presence of simultaneous atrial and ventricular contractions were observed in all three fetuses, leading to an increase in central venous pressure in all and hydrops fetalis in two cases without evidence of ventricular dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Echocardiographic criteria required for postnatal diagnosis of AIVR can be documented in utero using specific ultrasonographic approaches. During fetal life, AIVR may not be a benign entity. Hydrops fetalis is frequently associated with AIVR because of increase in central venous pressure related to simultaneous atrioventricular contractions; thus, the ultrasonographic investigation protocol of fetuses with unexplained hydrops fetalis should aim at ruling out AIVR and include Doppler flow recordings in SVC/Ao, DV, AoI, DA and umbilical vein. Copyright © 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".