VIEWING THE CONCEPT OF REALISM IN ART THROUGH THE FACT OF WAR
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, the personal attitudes of the artists towards the wars of the recent history are approached in terms of the relationship they establish between their products and the historical period they witness. History of art has been showing that many of the artists are not indifferent to the social traumas faced; and on the contrary, they include these traumas into the main problems of their producing activities. Art, when described as a kind of mental action in perception of the reality, primarily draws the relationship of the modern culture with the arts to the realistic ground, in the most basic sense. Thus, the relationship between the fact of war and the production of art have been expressed on the axis of comprehending the reality, regarding the artists' point of views both on the art and the life; and by selecting a series of artworks, which have revealed the ability of art to create deep effects on the social perception, as the subjects for their studies, the possibilities being derived from the historical reserve of art have been examined, at a historical moment that the civilization could not overcome the war and violence cycle.The works, which are on war and reality concepts, of the artists such as Otto Dix, Pablo Picasso and Leon Golub were focused in this study; and the study is limited to the mostly discussed ones among these works.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it