MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2563325642 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofw172.973

A Phase I Randomized, Observer-Blind, Controlled, Dose Escalation Trial of the Safety and Tolerability of Two Intramuscular Doses of DPX-RSV(A), a Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Vaccine Containing RSV SH Antigen and a Novel Adjuvant DepoVax, or SH Antigen Co-administered With Aluminum Hydroxide, or Placebo to Healthy Adults ≥50–64 Years of Age

2016· article· en· W2563325642 on OpenAlexaff
Joanne M. Langley, Lisa D. MacDonald, Genevieve Weir, Donna MacKinnon‐Cameron, Lingyun Ye, Shelly McNeil, Bert Schepens, Xavier Saelens, Marianne M. Stanford, Scott A. Halperin

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory viral infections research
Canadian institutionsImmunovaccine (Canada)Nova Scotia Health AuthorityIzaak Walton Killam Health CentreDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTolerabilityPalivizumabVirologyAdverse effectRandomized controlled trialVirusRespiratory systemInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background. RSV causes lower respiratory tract infection in children, the immunosuppressed, and older adults. Currently, there is no licensed vaccine for RSV infection. Subsequent to pre-clinical studies showing proof of principle, we are conducting a first-in-humans study of a novel RSV antigen (Ag) from the ectodomain of the Short Hydrophobic protein of RSV, formulated in the lipid and oil-based vaccine platform, DepoVax, termed DPX-RSV(A) (NCT02472548). Methods. Healthy persons 50 to 64 years of age in good general health were enrolled beginning May 2015, and randomized 2:2:1 in to two dose levels of a DPX-RSV(A) (10 or 25 µg), or synthetic RSV SH Ag with or without 125 µg Aluminum hydroxide, or saline placebo control. Dose escalation occurred in two sequential steps. A booster dose was given at Day (D) 56. Per protocol, if any participant in any vaccine group had anti-SH antibody (Ab) on D28, then the RSV(A)-Alum groups received a placebo booster. Participants and observers were blinded to allocation. Solicited local and general adverse events (AE) were collected on a memory aide D0-6 post-injection and unsolicited AE through to D28 post-injection. Serious AE (SAE), medically attended AE (MAE), and potentially immune mediated disease (pIMD) were collected to D236. Blood samples for IgG Ab to SH Ag and hematologic or biochemical parameters were collected on D 0, 7, 28, 56, 63, 84 and 236; immunogenicity results are in progress. The study is ongoing. Results. With 40 participants enrolled, the mean age was 55.3 years (SD 3.97); 72.5% were female. Ab response was detected at D28, so RSV(A)-Alum subjects received placebo for dose 2 (D56). Pain was the most common local AE, reported in 14/40 (37.5%) overall; 14/15 had Grade (Gr) 1 pain and 1 had Gr 2 pain. No swelling or redness occurred D0-6. Pain did not increase with dose 2. Drowsiness (0-37.5% per group; all Gr 1) and muscle aches (0-25% per group; 7 subjects rated grade 1 and 1 rated Gr 3) were most common solicited general AE. Unsolicited AE occurred in 25-75% of subjects per group. MAEs occurred in all groups except RSV(A)-Alum 10 µg (total n = 8). No pIMD or SAE occurred. Antigen-specific immune responses to RSV SH were demonstrated post vaccination. Conclusion. A novel RSV Ag from the SH protein of RSV, formulated in the lipid and oil-based vaccine platform, DepoVax, had an acceptable safety and induced antigen specific antibody responses. Disclosures. J. Langley, Immunovaccine: Grant Investigator, Research support. GlaxoSmithKline: Investigator, Research grant. Novavax: Investigator, Research grant; L. MacDonald, Immunovaccine Inc.: Employee, Salary; G. Weir, Immunoivaccine: Employee, Salary; S. McNeil, GSK: Grant Investigator, Research grant and Research support; B. Schepens, VBI: Employee, Salary; X. Saelens, VIB: Employee and VIB and UGhent hold patent rights on SHe-based vaccines and treatment options for RSV: patent application WO2012/065997 (24.05.2012) with Bert Schepens, Walter Fiers, and Xavier Saelens as inventors, Salary; M. Stanford, Immunovaccine Inc.: Employee, Salary

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.960

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesSame topicRespiratory viral infections researchFrench-language works237,207