MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2563446875 · doi:10.1194/jlr.p068833

Unsupervised analysis of combined lipid and coagulation data reveals coagulopathy subtypes among dialysis patients

2016· article· en· W2563446875 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Daniel Contaifer, Daniel Carl, Urszula Osinska Warncke, Bassem M. Mohammed, Benjamín Van Tassell, Donald F. Brophy, Charles E. Chalfant, Dayanjan S. Wijesinghe

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Lipid Research · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSphingolipid Metabolism and Signaling
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentNational Institutes of HealthNational Cancer InstituteNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteSCIEXU.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
KeywordsSphingolipidHemodialysisPeritoneal dialysisMedicineDialysisInternal medicineCoagulationCoagulopathyEnd stage renal diseaseGastroenterologyDiseaseIntensive care medicineCardiologyBiologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) are the primary means of managing end stage renal disease (ESRD). However, these treatment modalities are associated with the onset of coagulation abnormalities. Effective management of coagulation risk among these patients requires the identification of surrogate markers that provide an early indication of the coagulation abnormalities. The role of sphingolipids in the manifestation and prediction of coagulation abnormalities among dialysis patients have never been investigated. Herein, we report the first instance of an in depth investigation into the sphingolipid changes among ESRD patients undergoing HD and PD. The results reveal distinct differences in terms of perturbations to specific sphingolipid biosynthetic pathways that are highly dependent on the treatment modality. Our studies also demonstrated strong correlation between specific sphingolipids and coagulation parameters, such as HexCer(d18:1/26:0) and maximal amplitude (MA), SM(d18:1/24:1) and tissue factor pathway inhibitor, and sphingosine 1-phosphate d18:1 and FX (Spearman ρ of 0.93, 0.89, and −0.89, respectively). Furthermore, our study revealed the potential for using HexCer(d18:1/22:0), HexCer(d18:1/24:0), and HexCer(d18:1/26:0) (r2 = 0.71, 0.82, and 0.63, respectively) and coagulation parameter MA (r2 = 0.7) for successful diagnosis of differential coagulopathies among ESRD patients undergoing HD, providing an opportunity toward personalized disease management. Hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) are the primary means of managing end stage renal disease (ESRD). However, these treatment modalities are associated with the onset of coagulation abnormalities. Effective management of coagulation risk among these patients requires the identification of surrogate markers that provide an early indication of the coagulation abnormalities. The role of sphingolipids in the manifestation and prediction of coagulation abnormalities among dialysis patients have never been investigated. Herein, we report the first instance of an in depth investigation into the sphingolipid changes among ESRD patients undergoing HD and PD. The results reveal distinct differences in terms of perturbations to specific sphingolipid biosynthetic pathways that are highly dependent on the treatment modality. Our studies also demonstrated strong correlation between specific sphingolipids and coagulation parameters, such as HexCer(d18:1/26:0) and maximal amplitude (MA), SM(d18:1/24:1) and tissue factor pathway inhibitor, and sphingosine 1-phosphate d18:1 and FX (Spearman ρ of 0.93, 0.89, and −0.89, respectively). Furthermore, our study revealed the potential for using HexCer(d18:1/22:0), HexCer(d18:1/24:0), and HexCer(d18:1/26:0) (r2 = 0.71, 0.82, and 0.63, respectively) and coagulation parameter MA (r2 = 0.7) for successful diagnosis of differential coagulopathies among ESRD patients undergoing HD, providing an opportunity toward personalized disease management. Dialysis is the primary treatment for patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD). While this treatment modality has made significant advances over the past years, ERSD patients still have unacceptably high rates of mortality (1.Kidney Disease Statistics for the United States. Accessed March 8, 2016, at http://www.niddk.nih.gov/health-information/health-statistics/Pages/kidney-disease-statistics-united-states.aspx.Google Scholar). Indeed, CVD is the primary cause of mortality among patients with ESRD, accounting for about 45% of all deaths (2.Hage F.G. Venkataraman R. Zoghbi G.J. Perry G.J. DeMattos A.M. Iskandrian A.E. The scope of coronary heart disease in patients with chronic kidney disease.J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2009; 53: 2129-2140Crossref PubMed Scopus (181) Google Scholar). Complicating this is the fact that ESRD patients present paradoxical pathology of coagulation; a pro-coagulant state is observed while they are also at significant risk of increased bleeding (3.Hughes S. Szeki I. Nash M.J. Thachil J. Anticoagulation in chronic kidney disease patients–the practical aspects.Clin. Kidney J. 2014; 7: 442-449Crossref PubMed Scopus (75) Google Scholar). The pro-coagulant profile is a prevalent problem on the arteriovenous graft site (4.Palomar R. Morales P. Rodrigo E. Castañeda O. Fernández-Fresnedo G. Gómez-Alamillo C. Arias M. Venous graft thrombosis in patients on peritoneal dialysis before transplantation.Transplant. Proc. 2007; 39: 2128-2130Crossref PubMed Scopus (16) Google Scholar) leading to complications in performing the hemodialysis (HD) treatment and places these patients at risk of general vascular thrombosis. Therefore, the hemostatic balance in ESRD patients receiving dialysis modalities is often a guessing game. Thus, bleeding abnormalities associated with ESRD are difficult to assess due to both the overlapping pro-coagulant and pro-bleeding profiles (5.Hedges S.J. Dehoney S.B. Hooper J.S. Amanzadeh J. Busti A.J. Evidence-based treatment recommendations for uremic bleeding.Nat. Clin. Pract. Nephrol. 2007; 3: 138-153Crossref PubMed Scopus (179) Google Scholar). We have previously investigated the coagulopathy associated with ESRD in a single-center cross-sectional study of HD and peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients (6.Brophy D.F. Carl D.E. Mohammed B.M. Song J. Martin E.J. Bostic J.L. Gehr T.W.B. Differences in coagulation between hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis.Perit. Dial. Int. 2014; 34: 33-40Crossref PubMed Scopus (11) Google Scholar). This study identified a pro-coagulant phenotype among the dialysis patients. Furthermore, this pro-coagulant profile was observed to be more prominent among the PD patients. However, the coagulation parameters used in this study were unable to identify significant determinants of the pro-coagulant risk among the HD population because of the inclusion of subjects with high and low thrombotic potentials. This suggests that coagulation parameters alone are insufficient to determine the pro-coagulant risk among the study population and that additional data are required. In terms of the identification of coagulopathies, lipids have been relatively understudied despite the fact that many lipids are involved in coagulation cascades (7.Kim J-A. Kim J-E. Song S.H. Kim H.K. Influence of blood lipids on global coagulation test results.Ann. Lab. Med. 2015; 35: 15-21Crossref PubMed Scopus (40) Google Scholar). Furthermore, to date, no studies have investigated the role of sphingolipids, specifically, with respect to the coagulation potential of ESRD patients undergoing dialysis. Given that the coagulation parameters alone were insufficient to discriminate the pro-coagulant potential among the cohort of dialysis patients in our previous study, and the fact that the lipids have a close association with coagulation, led us to investigate the variability of the lipidome and especially the sphingolipidome as an additional orthogonal measurement to delineate between pro-coagulant dialysis subpopulations. The data demonstrate a clear distinction in the sphingolipid profiles of the different coagulation phenotypes among the dialysis patients and the feasibility of using a limited subset of combined sphingolipids and coagulation parameters as a potential biomarker for identifying patient subpopulations susceptible to clotting events. A single-center cross-sectional pilot study was designed to characterize differences in biochemical, cellular, and functional coagulation parameters in patients receiving maintenance HD and PD. Fifty subjects were enrolled in the study, including: 10 healthy volunteers who served as a baseline reference; 20 subjects receiving thrice-weekly maintenance HD; and 20 subjects receiving maintenance continuous cycling PD. The continuous cycling PD regimen consisted of four 2 h exchanges nightly and one 6 h dialysis exchange daily. Each HD patient received thrice-weekly 4 h high-flux HD sessions using a Fresenius Optiflux 180 dialyzer (Fresenius Medical Care North America, Waltham, MA). Of the 20 HD patients, 18 had arteriovenous grafts and 2 had tunneled central venous catheters because of multiple arteriovenous graft failures. Only patients that had a full dataset for coagulation parameters and lipidomic variables were used in the statistical analysis strategy, resulting in 9 healthy volunteers, 19 HD patients, and 17 PD patients. All subjects received recombinant human erythropoietin as a standard-of-care anemia treatment. Subjects were excluded if they had any recent trauma or surgery (<7 days), active bleeding or a known bleeding disorder (for example, von Willebrand disease, hemophilia), active thrombosis or known thrombotic tendency (for example, antithrombin III, protein C, or protein S deficiency), cirrhosis or other liver abnormality, active cancer, thrombocytopenia (platelets <100 × 109/l), or concurrent use of fish oil or antiplatelet or antithrombotic medications. The VCU Institutional Review Board approved the study before subject enrollment, and the study itself was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All subjects provided written informed consent before study commencement. Upon enrollment of subjects into the study, demographics, laboratory chemistry parameters, and coagulation parameters were recorded. Blood (approximately 25 ml) was collected through a 15-gauge needle into a syringe: 5 ml was injected into each of four 3.2% sodium citrate tubes, and 5 ml was injected into a serum separator tube. In HD patients, the blood samples were drawn immediately before dialysis to avoid interference with heparin administration. Sodium citrate tubes were treated with 180 μl heparinase before sample processing to avoid potential heparin contamination. All blood samples were assayed within 2 h of collection for coagulation parameters. Coagulation proteins [tissue factor (TF), TF pathway inhibitor (TFPI), and von Willebrand factor (vWf)] were assessed using tissue tissue factor pathway inhibitor, and were using and factor and factor were using the clotting All were to the and were in The of the is analysis was using blood to the on A.J. The role of lipids in with to the PubMed Google Scholar). identify and with and with were A of each was treated with ml as a of and the the of were using of high was to of a use of the with to and In coagulation was to determine and the of blood The clotting parameters and onset were using the analysis The is the and a of was using a and the of to of and maximal amplitude of were All were using previously in the M. G. P. of in Dialysis Dial. 2009; PubMed Scopus Google M. G. of associated with chronic kidney PubMed Scopus Google Kim M. kidney and liver and in through PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). were in and the of the is were as previously M. of high for the analysis of PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). a μl of each of the study samples was with of each sphingolipid and lipids were a The was to and for 6 h at the were to a and in and at for The in and at are to our previously J. of using a 3: PubMed Scopus Google Scholar) and were to the to of the lipids were using a × on a and using a and 5 and 5 in and at for at a of at with using a was used to and sphingolipids were using The parameters for of sphingolipids the are as with the for the are provided in were as previously us M. of high for the analysis of PubMed Scopus Google M. is for a and the of 2014; PubMed Scopus Google analysis for and investigation of Care PubMed Google Scholar). analysis of the lipids in the was using as with M. of high for the analysis of PubMed Scopus Google analysis of the and of 2009; PubMed Scopus Google J. The of to Scopus Google Scholar). to μl of and 10 of each was The samples were using a at for the was at for 20 and the was into a tube. The were and in for A a × and a was used to the at a of at The was first with A for 2 and 10 μl of sample was A was used for the first 2 of was increased in a to to to 6 to to 10 and to was was to and at The were using a in were using The parameters used and potential were The statistical is in of the HD and PD a analysis was used for the is a of in a dataset that are close to each other to of other is a that with each in the that are are combined into a is one all the This of of that be as within a The data were the identified for the were identified and excluded using test to the sample we the of the and the were using as test with for was The of was correlation was used to association between coagulation and Only the were for each of variables in the identified for HD and PD patients. was used to and the the of the assessed the of the The with and were as the analysis the of the to discriminate the while for and analysis was used to associated with using a sample of patients as the The were as and of were the All were with statistical respect to coagulopathies among dialysis patients, lipids are understudied is for in the coagulation A.J. The role of lipids in with to the PubMed Google M. R. lipids and blood PubMed Scopus Google P. in blood PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). In to combined and coagulation parameters identify dialysis patients that have a for clotting we a specific statistical analysis using combined coagulation and data analysis of HD patients and demonstrated distinct were as HD and a that patients the other analysis of PD patients and distinct PD patients dialysis and the and PD patients The of the patients into these distinct on the variability in coagulation and phenotypes the of distinct disease among the dialysis and = = = is as a of heart or coronary for the HD were for the HD were of on of subjects were enrolled for the study of 10 patients, 20 PD patients, and 20 HD patients. The data are as or blood kidney human blood serum CVD is as a of heart or coronary Blood for the HD were in a A of subjects were enrolled for the study of 10 patients, 20 PD patients, and 20 HD patients. The data are as or blood kidney human blood serum Our analysis of HD revealed that patients into and demonstrated of sphingosine 1-phosphate d18:1 and with In the demonstrated significant of SM(d18:1/24:1) and a of and with the other demonstrated a significant in and as with while at the of HexCer(d18:1/22:0), HexCer(d18:1/24:0), and distinct differences among the sphingolipids a central of the sphingolipid between and as with Furthermore, each of these in depth revealed that both and demonstrated and and of and The patients demonstrated a pro-bleeding FX high and low of the other the patients were a pro-coagulant high and low a and are for coagulation and lipidomic = = = different different different different different different different different different different different different different different different different different different different different different different d18:1 different different different different different different different different different different different different different different different different different different different different parameters with significant among and are as and different different in a on the of combined coagulation and data identification of the disease The of the the on the significant parameters identified the HD and and PD have for coagulation in The in HD and in PD clotting parameters of a pro-coagulant the in the HD factor and of parameters with clotting parameters of a pro-bleeding Only parameters with significant among and are as and While our analysis with respect to the combined parameters of and coagulation was successful at the HD patients as as among the HD patients, this was the for the PD patients. In this instance patients with the patients. this combined the healthy subjects was to identify the of the patients with the they were an phenotype for the of this The were used for statistical with PD patients that was observed among the HD patients, were significant among the ESRD patients undergoing PD that into the to the patients undergoing HD, these patients demonstrated of d18:1 and in the HD pro-bleeding patients, was as in the HD pro-coagulant patients, and SM(d18:1/24:1) were with the The also of and and of with an was that the 2 as as were also Furthermore, PD patients in the demonstrated of and to the HD patients. also and a high of The pro-coagulant was high and low The of were also is of the data the of at distinct disease among the PD patients, that into the demonstrate significant to coagulation and and patients were for coagulation and lipidomic = = different different different different different different different different different different different different different d18:1 different different different different different different different different different different different different parameters with a significant between and are as and different in a Only parameters with a significant between and are as and Our demonstrated that significant and coagulation abnormalities are among ESRD dialysis patients In with these in the and of the coagulation proteins were also observed to be for the dialysis patients with of and and a of FX are for the pro-coagulant or pro-bleeding state in ESRD, as in our involved in the coagulation pathway are markers that to the in ESRD patients in were as to in pro-coagulant patients in HD as as in to an to in pro-bleeding patients in HD Our have demonstrated that the sphingolipids and coagulation in the successful of HD patients into pro-bleeding and pro-coagulant phenotypes This that is a close between the lipidome and the coagulation respect to the pro-coagulant patients the data revealed a strong correlation between SM(d18:1/24:1) and correlation of strong (Spearman correlation were also observed between and HexCer(d18:1/26:0) and as as and the pro-coagulant patients, strong were also observed between and and as as d18:1 and FX (Spearman correlation A significant were also observed in the of pro-bleeding HD patients between d18:1 and correlation of as as and correlation of were observed between HexCer(d18:1/26:0) and as as and correlation of and respectively). respect to pro-coagulant PD patients the data revealed strong between SM(d18:1/24:1) and as as d18:1 and correlation of and 0.71, respectively). our data a significant between the sphingolipid and coagulation ESRD patients undergoing dialysis. This the of using the sphingolipids as surrogate for in the coagulation among these between lipids and coagulation variables on parameters with ρ or and are in a Only parameters with ρ or and are that the of mortality among ESRD patients undergoing dialysis are thrombotic is to parameters to be used as of coagulation abnormalities. Our data that HD patients present high correlation between coagulation parameters and lipids the analysis demonstrated MA as the coagulation and HexCer(d18:1/22:0), HexCer(d18:1/24:0), and HexCer(d18:1/26:0) as the The use of these in a analysis that they be used as to pro-coagulant pro-bleeding HD was used for of the more significant variables as and was to discriminate pro-coagulant and pro-bleeding in HD with of using using with and were for are as and with of using in a Only with and were for are as and Our analysis has demonstrated the to distinct disease and coagulation data are the analysis was additional data were the study in to the of the The data revealed that of the HD patients identified as to to patients due to vascular thrombosis within the the other of the patients to had or more due to vascular thrombosis within the into that coagulation abnormalities to vascular thrombosis is a the study data a strong to discriminate patients who have vascular thrombosis due to coagulation abnormalities among the HD The of our study to identify the of coagulopathies among ESRD patients undergoing and to identify for coagulopathy to is that ESRD patients undergoing dialysis many abnormalities in hemostatic resulting in an risk of both thrombotic M. kidney disease and venous and Med. 2009; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar) and bleeding M. G. P. of in Dialysis Dial. 2009; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). the cause of mortality among dialysis patients is the of thrombosis M. G. of associated with chronic kidney PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). of data with coagulation data provided the to the coagulopathy among the dialysis patients. Furthermore, this also the between these orthogonal data this statistical also in with respect to changes in the lipidome among HD and PD patients, as as between different coagulation within these The fact that the in this study coagulopathy to the of our study and the statistical Our data demonstrated a strong pro-coagulant in PD patients previous for this patient The strong clotting of is demonstrated the high the the high the in high and the of was also that was an in the MA of the measurement and a in the an and a to the and of the in these patients and to the state of and coagulation A subset of PD patients was observed to with the patients, a distinct among the PD studies to be to identify any that to the of this subset of PD patients. Our data also an of the d18:1 and in the of ESRD patients undergoing dialysis. A previous study in that provided liver and kidney through a of d18:1 Kim M. kidney and liver and in through PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). d18:1 is a and is involved in in different and S. S. an PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). has also been to renal disease in is known to as an to at specific that were identified S. S. a PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). The that d18:1 is among dialysis patients provide an for the among these patients. Furthermore, a study S. as of PubMed Scopus Google Scholar) of the between sphingolipid and coagulopathy demonstrated that sphingosine and or on in This suggests that the in results an in chronic cause d18:1 and to the and to a pro-coagulant coagulation, the of d18:1 The d18:1 with to TF to more Thus, and d18:1 to and a patients with pro-coagulant demonstrated of is an that of and are to be an for 1-phosphate in and 2014; 34: PubMed Scopus Google and the of significant of an for the of at in PD patients. the to have of G. G. of human is dependent on of PubMed Scopus Google Scholar) have demonstrated that in the and protein The between d18:1 and was also In that study, and d18:1 was a and the and of Furthermore, of d18:1 was in that and are in with the pro-coagulant observed in the and patients, also be a leading to factor and as on patients, as the on the coagulopathy of the of d18:1 among ESRD patients, to be a of in and and an in of the among patients the pro-coagulant to the pro-bleeding of the of and and and has been demonstrated to be for the of sphingolipids S. M. S. of is to sphingolipid PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). were also on PD patients, with an in that is also a on ESRD The of in pro-coagulant patients HD to be an for this the correlation with coagulation variables observed in our study, this an with the phenotype on chronic HD treatment. The for this coagulopathy state be the different dialysis are on the of and to of the and to G. in and PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). The of these is and be in of in and and be investigated. be that an be made that if the sphingolipids are associated with coagulation, this association be with respect coagulation abnormalities of the of dialysis. However, be to the of the that as a of the of dialysis. In this Kim Kim Kim changes in serum of and in patients on Dial. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar) demonstrated that the dialysis modality in the our of the of the with respect to coagulation abnormalities among the HD patients is of the of our study are the relatively sample for the investigation and the of the to the chronic kidney disease patients. respect to the sample be especially in human this is In are many such studies have led to the identification of and high to the disease state R. O. as lipidomic for diagnosis of 2015; PubMed Scopus Google E. M. S. M. of to investigate in PubMed Scopus Google S. S.B. S. R. in and the lipidomic profile in patients with 2 a pilot Clin. PubMed Scopus Google M. G. C. C. A pilot study of patients treated with for for a in J. 2014; PubMed Scopus Google R. R. S. A.E. of in a pilot J. 2014; PubMed Scopus Google J. P. R. early changes in subjects with of PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). In our study, this of relatively sample is an toward the and risk of used in this the of a population of samples the study the statistical test to be to test the of the M. P. of and the 2015; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). potential of this sample is also the of of the PD patients with the patients, in the of any other we as an A sample to the of this subset of patients, the for studies with a cohort of patients for of this respect to the of our study, be that due to multiple complications and among ESRD patients, close of to the disease state is a significant identification of the of with the complications and as our ESRD patient and to a cohort was the and scope of the However, our primary in this study was to investigate potential means of identifying coagulation abnormalities among ESRD patients of any In this our data the potential for using combined coagulation and data for the of ESRD patients undergoing dialysis with respect to coagulation and a for an study to these In the of the coagulopathy among HD and PD patients using combined and coagulation variables demonstrate the of this to the phenotypes in chronic The and coagulation results are with the and with the of the patients. The associated with the coagulation pathway that the of the that are for the coagulopathies in these patients. our study has identified a limited of that are with the coagulopathy and investigation as for treatment. with the end stage renal disease hemodialysis hemodialysis maximal amplitude peritoneal dialysis peritoneal dialysis tissue factor tissue factor pathway inhibitor 2 von Willebrand factor

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.344
Threshold uncertainty score0.330

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Lipid ResearchSame topicSphingolipid Metabolism and SignalingFrench-language works237,207