MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2563455530 · doi:10.1016/s1525-0016(16)33130-6

321. Deletion of Mutated GAA Repeats from the Intron 1 of the Frataxin Gene Using the CRISPR System Restores the Protein Expression in a Friedreich Ataxia Model

2016· article· en· W2563455530 on OpenAlexaff
Dominique L. Ouellet, Joël Rousseau, Khadija Cherif, Catherine Gérard, Rénald Gilbert, Alain Garnier, Bruno Gaillet, Christian Beauséjour, Jacques P. Tremblay

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Therapy · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicGenetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalNational Research Council CanadaUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFrataxinBiologyCRISPRIntronGeneticsGeneTrinucleotide repeat expansionAtaxiaMolecular biologyGuide RNAGenome editingAlleleIron-binding proteins

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The CRISPR system is now widely used as a molecular tool to edit the genome. We used this technique in Friedreich Ataxia (FRDA), an inherited autosomal disease known to cause a decrease of the mitochondrial frataxin protein. Genetic analysis revealed a GAA repeat expansion within the intron 1 of the frataxin (FXN) gene. We used cells derived from the YG8sR mouse model where the mouse frataxin gene is knockout but contain a human FXN mutated transgene on one allele. We then deleted the GAA trinucleotide repeat using 2 specific guide RNAs (gRNAs) co-expressed with either S. pyogenes (Sp) or S. aureus (Sa) Cas9. We were able to monitored an increase up to 2-fold of frataxin mRNA and protein levels in clone cells. We also confirmed these results in vivo using DNA electroporation in the Tibialis anterior muscle of the YG8R mice. Ongoing in vivo investigation of a systemically injected AAV-DJ vector expressing the SaCas9 and 2 successful selected gRNAs in the mouse model YG8sR will hopefully provide more details answers on the efficacy of the approach and give us preliminary data to go forward for clinical trial. The deletion of the GAA repeats expansion then might be a highly valuable gene therapy approach for FRDA patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.347

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular TherapySame topicGenetic Neurodegenerative DiseasesFrench-language works237,207