MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2563770993 · doi:10.1109/oceans.2016.7761461

Tracking whales on the Scotian Shelf using passive acoustic monitoring on ocean gliders

2016· article· en· W2563770993 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Richard F. Davis, Mark F. Baumgartner, Adam Comeau, Dan L. Cunningham, Kim Davies, Arnold Furlong, Hansen D. Johnson, Sue L'Orsa, Tetjana Ross, Christopher T. Taggart, Frederick G. Whoriskey

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine animal studies overview
Canadian institutionsFisheries and Oceans CanadaGeoSpectrum Technologies (Canada)Dalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsWhaleMarine mammalOceanographyHabitatGliderEnvironmental scienceOcean observationsRight whaleComputer scienceMarine lifeFisheryMarine engineeringEcologyGeologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Expanded marine shipping and industrial activity has increased the risk of harmful effects on marine mammals. Quantitative estimates of marine mammal time and space distributions are essential for developing mitigation strategies designed to reduce the risks. Seasonal distributions of key marine mammals can be estimated by deploying passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) hydrophone systems and using the acoustic data to monitor, detect and identify species presence, often in near real-time. Most contemporary PAM deployments in the ocean are stationary and archive the acoustic data for post-recovery analyses after some extended period and are thus not ideal for addressing risk dynamics in near real-time. Substantive expansions of fixed PAM arrays over large ocean expanses can be economically and on-time limiting. Mobile autonomous vehicles now offer the economy of collecting the necessary acoustic and oceanographic data over extended periods and across large swaths of the ocean. They can operate with a high degree of spatial sampling flexibility in near real-time that cannot be easily achieved using fixed PAM arrays. The Whale Habitat and Listening Experiment (WHaLE), funded by the Marine Environmental Observation Prediction And Response Network (MEOPAR) at Dalhousie University, and using Ocean Tracking Network (OTN) autonomous vehicles, is searching for whale habitats and monitoring the distributional patterns of the endangered North Atlantic right whale and other at-risk baleen whales across the shelf waters of Atlantic Canada. This is being achieved through fixed PAM array deployments involving several research partners, as well as the deployment of profiling and surface gliders (autonomous vehicles) equipped with PAM systems capable of detecting and identifying baleen whales that produce sounds in the 10 - 2000 Hz frequency range. When fitted with onboard, automated detection and identification algorithms, the gliders can become powerful tools for near real-time monitoring of the at-risk whales and thus risk mitigation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.252
Threshold uncertainty score0.501

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2016
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMarine animal studies overview→French-language works237,207→