Bending Behavior to Fracture of an Aluminium Alloy Involving Pre-Strain
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The work associated to this abstract is focused on the modelling of an aluminium alloy under the shape of sheet. It characterizes the mechanical behaviour up to rupture of an AA6016 alloy, taking into account the anisotropy and the hardening of the metal. The mechanical tests on which the model is based on consist of uniaxial tension, simple shear and hydraulic bulging performed at room temperature up to rupture, except for the simple shear. The numerical model is constituted of three parts. The choice of the model is suited for ductile fracture and allows for high flexibility, thanks to a total of 21 material parameters. The material parameter identification is realised through an inverse methodology. The objective of such an approach is to minimize iteratively the gap between the experimental and numerical outputs. Validation of the results is then done with the help of bending tests. The bending tests are performed with and without pre-strain in tension prior to the air-bending. Different amplitudes of pre-strain allows to reach rupture or not in bending, thus giving the possibility to find the value of the parameter controlling the non-linear accumulation of the damage. The correlation between experiments and simulations is proved to be successful and gives a very good representation of the mechanical behaviour of the aluminium alloy studied.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".