MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2564049011 · doi:10.3749/canmin.1500085

Two Astrophyllite-Supergroup Minerals: Bulgakite, A New Mineral From the Darai-Pioz Alkaline Massif, Tajikistan and Revision of the Crystal Structure and Chemical Formula of Nalivkinite

2016· article· en· W2564049011 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCrystal Structures and Properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersRussian Academy of SciencesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsMassifMineralGeologySupergroupGeochemistryMineralogyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Bulgakite, ideally Li 2 (Ca,Na)Fe 2+ 7 Ti 2 (Si 4 O 12 ) 2 O 2 (OH) 4 (O,F)(H 2 O) 2 , and nalivkinite, ideally Li 2 NaFe 2+ 7 Ti 2 (Si 4 O 12 ) 2 O 2 (OH) 4 F(H 2 O) 2 , are astrophyllite-supergroup minerals. Bulgakite is a new mineral from the Darai-Pioz alkaline massif in the upper reaches of the Darai-Pioz river, in the area of the joint Turkestansky, Zeravshansky, and Alaisky ridges, Tajikistan. Bulgakite was found in fenitized amphibole–quartz–feldspar rock with brannockite, sogdianite, bafertisite, albite, and titanite. Bulgakite is brownish orange, transparent in thin grains, and has a vitreous luster. Mohs hardness is 3, D meas. = 3.30(2) g/cm 3 , D calc. = 3.326 g/cm 3 . Bulgakite is biaxial (+) with refractive indices (λ = 589 nm) α = 1.695(3), β = 1.711(2), γ = 1.750(3); 2 V meas. = 70(5)°, 2 V calc. = 67°, strong dispersion: r > v . Cleavage is perfect parallel to {001} and moderate parallel to {010}. Chemical analysis by electron microprobe gave SiO 2 35.63, Al 2 O 3 0.95, Na 2 O 1.04, K 2 O 3.27, Cs 2 O 0.31, CaO 2.56, MgO 0.16, ZnO 0.15, FeO 29.24, MnO 7.14, TiO 2 11.07, Nb 2 O 5 0.49, ZrO 2 0.37, SnO 2 1.18, F 1.01, Li 2 O 1.36 (AAS), Rb 2 O 0.85 (AAS), (H 2 O) calc. 4.04, sum 100.38 wt.%, H 2 O was calculated from crystal-structure analysis. The empirical formula based on 31.94 (O + OH + F + H 2 O) pfu is (Li 0.94 K 0.91 Rb 0.12 Cs 0.03 ) Σ2 (Ca 0.60 Na 0.40 ) Σ1 (Fe 2+ 5.34 Mn 1.32 Li 0.25 Mg 0.05 Na 0.04 Zn 0.02 ) Σ7.02 (Ti 1.82 Sn 0.10 Nb 0.05 Zr 0.04 ) Σ2.01 [(Si 7.78 Al 0.24 ) Σ8.02 O 24 ]O 2 (OH) 4 (F 0.70 O 0.30 )[(H 2 O) 0.94 □ 1.06 ] Σ2 , Z = 1. Bulgakite is triclinic, space group P , a 5.374(1), b 11.965(2), c 11.65(3) A, α 113.457(8), β 94.533(8), γ 103.08(1)°, V 657.5(8) A 3 . The six strongest reflections in the X-ray powder diffraction data [ d (A), I, ( hkl )] are: 10.54, 100, (001); 3.50, 100, (003); 2.578, 100, (130); 2.783, 90, (1 2); 1.576, 68, (3 1, 2); 2.647, 55, ( 11). The crystal structure has been refined to R 1 = 2.6% for 3592 unique F o > 4σ F ) reflections. In the crystal structure of bulgakite, there are four [4] T sites, with T –O> = 1.626 A, occupied mainly by Si, with minor Al. The TO 4 tetrahedra constitute the T 4 O 12 astrophyllite ribbon. The [6] D site is occupied mainly by Ti, with D –φ> = 1.965 A (φ = O, F). The T 4 O 12 astrophyllite ribbons and D octahedra constitute the H (Heteropolyhedral) sheet. In the O (Octahedral) sheet, there are four Fe 2+ -dominant [6] M (1–4) sites, with = 2.159 A (φ = O, OH). Two H and the central O sheets form the HOH block, and adjacent HOH blocks link via a common anion (X P D ) of two D octahedra. In the I (Intermediate) block between adjacent HOH blocks, there are two interstitial cation sites, A and B , and a W site, partly occupied by H 2 O. The A site splits into two partly occupied sites, [13] A (1) and [6] A (2), with A(1)–A(2) = 1.16 A. The [6] A (2) site is occupied by Li with = 2.285 A (φ = O, F, H 2 O), and the [13] A (1) site is occupied by K, Rb, and Cs with = 3.298 A. The aggregate content of the A site is (Li 0.94 K 0.91 Rb 0.12 Cs 0.03 ) Σ2 , ideally Li 2 apfu . The [10] B site is occupied by (Ca 0.60 Na 0.40 ) with B –φ> = 2.593 A. The W site is occupied by [(H 2 O) 0.94 □ 1.06 ] Σ2 pfu . The mineral is named bulgakite after Lev Vasil9evich Bulgak (born 1955), Russian mineralogist, gemologist, and discoverer of several new minerals. The crystal structure of nalivkinite has been revised and refined to R 1 = 4.52% for 3546 unique ( F o > 4σ F ) reflections: space group P , a 5.374(3), b 11.948(5), c 11.676(5) A, α 113.360(6), β 94.538(8), γ 103.01(1)°, V 658.7(9) A 3 , Z = 1, D calc. = 3.347 g/cm 3 . The revised empirical formula of nalivkinite is based on 32.14 (O + OH + F + H 2 O) pfu : (Li 1.14 K 0.75 Cs 0.09 Pb 0.02 ) Σ2 (Na 0.71 Ca 0.29 ) Σ1 (Fe 2+ 5.62 Mn 0.90 Zr 0.08 Na 0.08 Mg 0.04 Zn 0.04 ) Σ6.76 (Ti 1.56 Nb 0.24 Sn 0.09 Zr 0.08 Ta 0.04 ) Σ2 [(Si 7.86 Al 0.15 ) Σ8.01 O 24 ]O 2 (OH) 4 F[(H 2 O) 1.14 □ 0.86 ] Σ2 . The presence of H 2 O groups in the bulgakite and nalivkinite structures was confirmed by infrared spectroscopy. Bulgakite is a Ca-analogue of nalivkinite. Bulgakite and nalivkinite are related by the following substitution: 0.3 B Ca 2+ + 0.3 X O 2– ↔ 0.3 B Na + + 0.3 X F – .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.732
Threshold uncertainty score0.745

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it