MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2564455428 · doi:10.1002/pbc.26368

Outcome and prognostic factors in high‐risk childhood adrenocortical carcinomas: A report from the European Cooperative Study Group on Pediatric Rare Tumors (EXPeRT)

2016· article· en· W2564455428 on OpenAlex
Giovanni Cecchetto, Alba Ganarin, Ewa Bień, Peter Vorwerk, Gianni Bisogno, Jan Godziński, Patrizia Dall’Igna, Yves Réguerre, Dominik T. Schneider, Laurence Brugières, Pierre Leblond, Andrea Ferrari, Ines B. Brecht, Angela De Paoli, Daniel Orbach

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Blood & Cancer · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors
Canadian institutionsPediatric Oncology Group
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAdrenocortical carcinomaHazard ratioConfidence intervalLymph nodeRetrospective cohort studyPopulationInternal medicineOncology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Objectives The aim of this retrospective international analysis was to evaluate the role of risk factors in pediatric patients with adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) observed in European countries (2000–2013) in an attempt to identify factors associated with poor prognosis. Procedures Data were retrieved from databases of Germany, France, Poland, and Italy, which form the European Cooperative Study Group on Pediatric Rare Tumors (EXPeRT). Patients were less than 18 years old, with at least one of the following tumor‐related risk factors: metastases, volume more than 200 cm 3 , Cushing syndrome, vascular or regional lymph node invasion, initial biopsy, or incomplete excision. Role of patients’ age was also evaluated. Results Eighty‐two patients were evaluated: 62 with localized disease and 20 with metastases. The 3‐year progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 39% and 55% for the whole population, respectively, and 51% and 73% for localized diseases, respectively. Concerning the whole population, PFS and OS were influenced by distant metastases, tumor volume, lymph node involvement, age, and presence of two or more risk factors. Factors significant only at OS were vascular involvement and incomplete surgery. At multivariable analysis, the main factors at PFS were volume more than 200 cm 3 (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.6, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.18–5.70) and presence of distant metastases (HR: 8.26, 95% CI: 3.49–19.51). The OS was significantly influenced by the presence of metastases ( P < 0.0001). Concerning patients with localized tumors, the only significant prognostic factor was volume more than 200 cm 3 with a HR of 4.38 (95% CI: 1.60–12.00) for PFS and of 3.68 (95% CI: 1.02–13.30) for OS. Conclusions Distant metastases and large tumor volume were the main unfavorable prognostic factors. Presence of two or more factors related to ACC was associated with an aggressive behavior of disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.941

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it