Bibliographic record
Abstract
To assess whether long-term thiazide use is associated with a decreased risk of hip fracture, a nested case-control study was done in the Canadian province of Saskatchewan between 1984 and 1985 among residents who were 65 years of age or older and who were not receiving other drugs thought to affect bone mass. There were 905 hip fractures identified from hospital discharge records and 5137 population controls matched for age, sex, and calendar year. Drug use was ascertained from computerised pharmacy records. Risk of hip fracture decreased significantly with increasing duration of current thiazide use: relative risk (95% confidence interval) of 1.2 (0.9-1.5) for less than 2 years use, 0.8 (0.7-1.0) for use of 2-5 years, and 0.5 (0.3-0.7) for 6 or more years. In contrast, there was no such trend for use of other antihypertensive-diuretic drugs (relative risk 0.9 [0.6-1.3] for use of 6 or more years). This protective effect was not altered by age, sex, nursing home residence, previous hospital admission, or use of other antihypertensive-diuretic drugs or psychotropic drugs. Medical record review for a sample of 235 cases suggested this finding was not due to confounding by body mass, ambulatory status, functional status, or dementia. These results support the hypothesis that thiazides protect against osteoporosis in elderly people.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".