MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2564530605 · doi:10.3846/2029882x.2016.1257373

BIG DATA IN CIVIL ENGINEERING: A STATE-OF-THE-ART SURVEY

2016· article· en· W2564530605 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Oleg Kapliński, Natalija Košeleva, Guoda Ropaitė

Bibliographic record

VenueEngineering Structures and Technologies · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicBig Data and Business Intelligence
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersStrategic International Collaborative Research ProgramNational Center for Research ResourcesNational High-tech Research and Development ProgramProgram for New Century Excellent Talents in UniversityNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Institutes of HealthSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaDepartment of Education of Liaoning ProvinceNatural Science Foundation of Tianjin CityNational Tsing Hua UniversityNational Research Foundation of KoreaEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilMinistry of Science, ICT and Future PlanningCity University of Hong KongHong Kong Polytechnic UniversityNatural Science Foundation of Fujian ProvinceQatar National Research FundChinese Academy of SciencesU.S. Department of EnergyNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaU.S. Department of DefenseMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyEuropean CommissionProgram for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in UniversityNational University of SingaporeNational Research FoundationUniversity of NottinghamQatar FoundationTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing CompanyRWTH Aachen UniversityMinistry of Education of the People's Republic of ChinaNational Science CouncilFonds National de la Recherche LuxembourgU.S. Department of AgricultureCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research OrganisationDepartment of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, IndiaNational Science Fund for Distinguished Young ScholarsNational Science Foundation
KeywordsBig dataAgency (philosophy)State agencyRaw dataScience and engineeringData scienceData collectionWeb of scienceEngineeringComputer scienceLibrary sciencePolitical scienceSociologyMathematicsEngineering ethicsData miningStatisticsSocial scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Data generation has increased drastically over the past few years. Data management has also grown in importance because extracting the significant value out of a huge pile of raw data is of prime importance while making different decisions. This article reviews the concept of Big Data. The Thomson Reuters Web of Science Core Collection academic database was used to overview publications that contained “BIG DATA” keywords and were included in Web of Science Category under “Engineering”. The analysis of publications was made according to year, country, journal, authors, language and funding agency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.617
Threshold uncertainty score0.378

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEngineering Structures and TechnologiesSame topicBig Data and Business IntelligenceFrench-language works237,207