MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Dabigatran Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics during Renal Replacement Therapy

2015· article· en· W2564550290 on OpenAlexaff
Alison Martin, Rommel G. Tirona, Moist Louise, Alejandro Lazo‐Langner

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences CentreWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDabigatranMedicineDialysis catheterHemodialysisDialysisProthrombin complex concentrateAnesthesiaRenal replacement therapyContext (archaeology)PharmacodynamicsAnticoagulantAcute kidney injuryWarfarinPharmacokineticsSurgeryInternal medicineAtrial fibrillation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Dabigatran is an oral direct thrombin inhibitor approved for use in prevention and treatment of thromboembolism. There is currently no reliable strategy for reversing its anticoagulant effects. The use of activated prothrombin complex concentrates has been reported, however, the relationship between dabigatran concentration and anticoagulation parameters in this setting have not been formally assessed or documented. There are also few reports on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of dabigatran in the context of renal replacement therapy. This report describes a case of dabigatran overdose and management with factor eight bypassing activity (FEIBA), and hemodialysis. Case Presentation: A 62-year-old man taking dabigatran 110 mg twice daily presented with hematemesis, shock, acute kidney injury, INR > 8 and PTT > 150 s, hemoglobin 104 g/L and creatinine 1675 µmol/L. Last dose of dabigatran was ingested within 10 hours of presentation. Additional complications included hematuria, pulmonary hemorrhage, gastrointestinal bleeding and cardiac arrest. The patient required multiple blood transfusions at presentation. In an attempt to reverse the anticoagulant effects of dabigatran, the patient received 42 units/kg of FEIBA. A dialysis catheter was placed approximately 2 hours later without complication. Conventional hemodialysis (CHD) was initiated for high clearances with blood flows of 200 mL/min over 4 hours, followed by continuous venovenous hemodialysis (CVVHD). No further blood transfusions were required following administration of dialysis. He had resolution of all hemorrhagic symptoms by day 5 and achieved partial recovery of kidney function. Dialysis was discontinued on day 3 and the patient was discharged to a rehabilitation facility on day 34. Results: Bloodwork drawn every 2 hours was analyzed for INR, PTT and dabigatran levels using HEMOCLOT® assay and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Two hours following FEIBA administration, INR and PTT decreased from 7.4 to 3.6 and 114 s to 100 s, respectively despite no significant change in dabigatran levels (1.26 µg/mL - 1.30 µg/mL). Plasma dabigatran half-lives were 5.4 hours during CHD, 28 hours with CVVHD and 65 hours post-dialysis. Dialytic clearance values for dabigatran were estimated with a pharmacometric model. Plasma dialysis clearance for CHD was 66 mL/min (plasma perfusion rate of 128 mL/min) while the plasma dialysis clearance for CVVHD was 20 mL/min (plasma perfusion rate of 101 mL/min). Conclusions: Information regarding management of dabigatran overdose is scarce. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to document the use of FEIBA in the acute management of dabigatran overdose with pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic testing. By use of HEMOCLOT® assay, we were able to demonstrate a rapid reversal of INR and PTT despite no significant change in dabigatran levels. This report supports the use of FEIBA for reversal of the anticoagulant effects of dabigatran for urgent procedures. This report also adds to literature demonstrating that dabigatran overdose should be initially treated with CHD rather than CVVHD. CHD with high flows and a high flux dialyzer is best, as it has greater efficiency of dabigatran clearance than CVVHD. Disclosures Lazo-Langner: Bayer: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes→French-language works237,207→