Heuristic Algorithm Based Energy Management System in Smart Grid
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Smart grid is one of the most advanced technologies which plays a key role in maintaining balance between demand and supply by implementing demand response (DR). Residential users basically effect the overall performance of traditional grid due to maximum requirement of their energy demand. Home energy management (HEM) benefit the end user by monitoring, managing and controlling their energy consumption. Appliance scheduling is integral part of HEM as it manages energy demand according to supply by automatically controlling the appliances or by shifting the load from peak to off peak hours. Recently different techniques based on artificial intelligence (AI) are used to meet these objectives. In this research work, we evaluate the performance of HEM which is designed on the basis of heuristic algorithms, wind driven optimization (WDO), ganetic algorithm (GA) and binary particle swarm optimisation (BPSO). Finally, simulations are conducted in MATLAB to validate the performance of scheduling techniques in terms of cost, reduced peak to average ratio (PAR) and equally distributed energy consumption pattern. The simulation results prove that WDO algorithm based HEM proves to perform efficiently than BPSO and GA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".