MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2564840758 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.panca16-b83

Abstract B83: Targeting TRPV6 oncochannel for the treatment of pancreatic cancer: A Phase I trial experience

2016· article· en· W2564840758 on OpenAlexaff
Siqing Fu, Stephen Welch, T. Toney Ilenchuk, Dominique Dugourd, Tyler Lutes, Chris Rice, Jack Stewart

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Treatment and Pharmacology
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MonctonLondon Health Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTolerabilityInternal medicinePhases of clinical researchProstate cancerGastroenterologyCancerAdverse effectUrologyToxicityOncology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: SOR-C13 is a first-in-human selective peptide inhibitor of Transient Receptor Potential Vanilloid 6 (TRPV6) oncochannel. TRPV6 is highly elevated in carcinomas including prostate, breast, lung and ovary and is correlated with poor outcomes. TRPV6-mediated Ca2+ entry is responsible for maintaining a high proliferation rate, increasing cell survival and apoptosis resistance. Since SOR-C13 blocks TRPV6-mediated Ca2+ influx it was evaluated as a single agent in patients with metastatic carcinomas. Methods: This was a Phase I, multi-center, open-label, dose escalation study to assess safety and tolerability of SOR-C13 in subjects with advanced carcinomas commonly known to express the TRPV6 channel (NCT01578564). Subjects received intravenous infusion of SOR-C13 over 90 minutes for 3 d on/4 d off, 3 d on/11 d off (21 d/cycle) until tumor progression, prohibitive toxicity or patient withdrawal. Tumors were assessed according to RECIST 1.1. Results: A total of 23 patients were enrolled to 4 dose levels and 119 cycles of therapy were administered. No study drug-related SAEs occurred. Twelve of 22 evaluable subjects (54.5%) had stable disease after 2 cycles. Promising clinical benefit was observed in two patients with advanced metastatic ductal pancreatic cancer. Subject 304 showed stable disease (SD) at dose level of 2.75 mg/kg for 12 weeks, and was removed from the study for persistent grade 2 hepatic transaminase elevation for more than 21 days. Subject 312, treated at dose level of 6.2 mg/kg, showed 7% decrease in tumor size after 2 cycles and a 27% decrease after 4 cycles. Tumor marker CA 19-9 responses were consistent with most changes in tumor size over the treatment cycles with suggestions of a dose related response and correlation with tumor size. The response of this biomarker was particularly evident in the patient initially treated at 6.2 mg/kg where it decreased by 29% after cycle two and by 55% after cycle 4. This patient was removed from the study after a total of 27 weeks 2 days. Both subjects failed at least three prior regimens of anticancer therapy: Subject 304 (i) IMRT/Tomotherapy plus chemoradiation with Folfirinox, (ii) Carboplatin/gemcitabine/Tarceva (iii) Abraxane/Gemcitabine, (iv) IMRT/Tomotherapy; Subject 312 (i) Folfirinox; (ii) gemcitabine and Abraxane; and, (iii) Xeloda. Conclusions: SOR-C13 was safe and well tolerated in subjects with advanced epithelial malignancies. The clinical benefit observed in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer, particularly 27% reduction of the sum of tumor diameters after 4 cycles warrants further investigation of this novel treatment in Phase II studies. Citation Format: Siqing Fu, Stephen Welch, Toney T. Ilenchuk, Dominique Dugourd, Tyler Lutes, Chris Rice, Jack M. Stewart.{Authors}. Targeting TRPV6 oncochannel for the treatment of pancreatic cancer: A Phase I trial experience. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Pancreatic Cancer: Advances in Science and Clinical Care; 2016 May 12-15; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(24 Suppl):Abstract nr B83.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.251
GPT teacher head0.556
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicCancer Treatment and Pharmacology→French-language works237,207→