MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2564868894 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2015-4955

Abstract 4955: Somatic alteration and depleted nuclear expression of BAP1 in human esophageal squamous cell carcinomas

2015· article· en· W2564868894 on OpenAlexaff
Takahiro Mori, Makiko Sumii, Fumiyoshi Fujishima, Kazuko Ueno, Masao Nagasaki, Chikashi Ishioka, Natsuko Chiba

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Aging
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBAP1Somatic cellBiologyCancer researchCancerGermline mutationMolecular biologyGeneMutationGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We have found a case of somatic non-synonymous mutation of BAP1, substituting phenylalanine to isoleucine at codon 170 (F170I) out of 49 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinomas (ESCs) examined by Sanger's direct sequencing. By in vivo Ubiquitination assay, deubiquitininase activity was suppressed in F170I, comparing with wild BAP1. BAP1 localization assay revealed that F170I mutant preferred to localize within cytoplasm although wild BAP1 mostly localizes within nucleus. Microarray analysis revealed that F170I has drastically altered gene expression profile. The following gene-ontology analyses indicated that expression of genes involved in oncogenic pathways has drastically altered by F170I. We have also found that BAP1 expression was depressed around 10% of ESCs examined by immunohistochemistry. It is interesting that nuclear BAP1-depleted cases have strong cytosolic expression of BAP1, instead. As nuclear localization of BAP1 is important in tumor suppressor function, BAP1 may be functionally inactivated around 10% of ESCs. Citation Format: Takahiro Mori, Makiko Sumii, Fumiyoshi Fujishima, Kazuko Ueno, Masao Nagasaki, Chikashi Ishioka, Natsuko Chiba. Somatic alteration and depleted nuclear expression of BAP1 in human esophageal squamous cell carcinomas. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 4955. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-4955

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicCancer Genomics and Diagnostics→French-language works237,207→