MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Screen for Small Molecules Capable of Expanding Human Hematopoietic Stem Cell Ex Vivo

2011· article· en· W2564914855 on OpenAlexaff
Iman Fares, Jalila Chagraoui, Jana Krošl, Denis‐Claude Roy, Sandra Cohen, Guy Sauvageau

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Canadian institutionsHôpital Maisonneuve-RosemontUniversité de MontréalInstitute for Research in Immunology and Cancer
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStem cellStem cell factorHaematopoiesisCD34Ex vivoTransplantationCord bloodPopulationThrombopoietinCell biologyHematopoietic stem cellChemistryProgenitor cellBiologyMolecular biologyImmunologyInternal medicineBiochemistryIn vitroMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 1919 Hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation is a life saving procedure whose applicability is restricted by the lack of suitable donors, by poor responsiveness to mobilization regimens in preparation of autologous transplantations, by insufficient HSC numbers in individual cord blood units, and by the inability to sufficiently amplify HSCs ex vivo. Characterization of Stemregenin (SR1), an aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) antagonist that promotes HSC expansion, provided a proof of principle that low molecular weight (LMW) compounds have the ability to promote HSC expansion. To identify novel putative agonists of HSC self-renewal, we initiated a high throughput screen (HTS) of a library comprising more than 5,000 LMW molecules using the in vitro maintenance of the CD34+CD45RA- phenotype as a model system. Our study was based on the fact that mobilized peripheral blood-derived CD34+CD45RA- cells cultured in media supplemented with: stem cell factor, thrombopoietin, FLT3 ligand and interleukin 6, would promote the expansion of mononuclear cells (MNC) concomitant with a decrease in CD34+CD45RA- population and HSC depletion. LMW compounds preventing this loss could therefore act as agonists of HSC expansion. In a 384-well plate, 2000 CD34+cells were initially cultured/well in 50μl medium comprising 1μM test compounds or 0.1% DMSO (vehicle). The proportions of CD34+CD45RA− cells were determined at the initiation of experiment and after a 7-day incubation. Six of 5,280 LMW compounds (0.11%) promoted CD34+CD45RA− cell expansion, and seventeen (0.32%) enhanced differentiation as determined by the increase in proportions of CD34−CD45RA+ cells compared to control (DMSO). The 6 LMW compounds promoting expansion of the CD34+CD45RA− cell population were re-analyzed in a secondary screen. Four out of these 6 molecules suppressed the transcriptional activity of AHR, suggesting that these compounds share the same molecular pathway as SR1 in stimulating HSC expansion, thus they were not further characterized. The remaining 2 compounds promoted, similar to SR1 or better, a 10-fold and 35-fold expansion of MNC during 7 and 12-day incubations, respectively. The expanded cell populations comprised 65–75% of CD34+ cells compared to 12–30% determined for DMSO controls. During 12-day incubation with these compounds, the numbers of CD34+ cells increased ∼25-fold over their input values, or ∼ 6-fold above the values determined for controls. This expansion of CD34+ cells was associated with a ∼5-fold increase in the numbers of multilineage CFC (granulocyte, erythroid, monocyte, and megakaryocyte, or CFU-GEMM) compared to that found in DMSO control cultures. The ability of the 2 newly identified compounds to expand functional HSCs is currently being evaluated in vivo usingimmunocompromised mice. In conclusion, results of our initial screen suggest that other mechanism, besides inhibition of AhR, are at play for expansion of human HSC. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation→French-language works237,207→