MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2564915970 · doi:10.1103/physrevc.91.064613

Dependence of the<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:mrow></mml:math>nuclear potential on nuclear incompressibility

2015· article· lv· W2564915970 on OpenAlexaff
S. Hossain, A. S. B. Tariq, A. Nilima, M. Sujan Islam, R. Majumder, M A Sayed, M. Masum Billah, M M B Azad, M. Alfaz Uddin, I. Reichstein, F. B. Malik, A. K. Basak

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review C · 2015
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersHelmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und EnergieUniversity Grants Commission of Bangladesh
KeywordsPhysicsPauli exclusion principleEnergy (signal processing)ScatteringAtomic physicsCondensed matter physicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nonmonotonic (NM) nucleus-nucleus potentials from the energy-density functional (EDF) theory including the Pauli principle have been considered for the nuclear incompressibility $K$ in the range 188--266 MeV. The experimental cross sections of the $^{16}\text{O}+^{16}\text{O}$ elastic scattering over the 31--350 MeV incident energies have been analyzed in the optical model using the NM potentials. Sensitivity of $K$ on the elastic scattering data is studied and its value for infinite cold nuclear matter deduced to be $222\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}5\phantom{\rule{0.28em}{0ex}}\mathrm{MeV}$.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.102

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0300.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review CSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207