MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2564917812 · doi:10.1049/iet-gtd.2016.1449

Impact of phase‐locked loop on small‐signal dynamics of the line commutated converter‐based high‐voltage direct‐current station

2017· article· en· W2564917812 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Generation Transmission & Distribution · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHVDC Systems and Fault Protection
Canadian institutionsRTDS Technologies (Canada)University of Toronto
FundersChina Scholarship Council
KeywordsPhase-locked loopLoop (graph theory)SIGNAL (programming language)Current (fluid)Line (geometry)VoltageDirect currentControl theory (sociology)Small-signal modelElectronic engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringElectrical engineeringJitterMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study investigates the impact of phase‐locked loop (PLL) and DC‐side voltage controller on small‐signal dynamics of the high‐voltage direct‐current (HVDC) inverter station system which utilises line commutated converter (LCC) technology. The studies are conducted based on eigenanalysis of a linearised model of a study system and verified by time‐domain simulation studies in the PSCAD platform. The studies show that under weak grid conditions, e.g. short‐circuit ratio (SCR) = 1, parameters of PLL and DC‐side voltage controller of the LCC‐HVDC station can highly impact the damping of the oscillatory modes and even cause instability. The studies also show that the voltage control parameters can be selected to prevent PLL‐induced instability. The studies also (i) show that maximum available power and critical SCR are highly affected by PLL and DC‐side voltage control and (ii) propose a procedure to systematically determine these indices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.579
Threshold uncertainty score0.634

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it