MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2565096807 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/now212.111

BMET-11. DURAL METASTASES FROM BREAST CANCER - CASE SERIES

2016· article· en· W2565096807 on OpenAlexaff
David R. Macdonald, Joseph Megyesi, Kylea Potvin

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences CentreWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBreast cancerHeadachesRadiologyAsymptomaticCancerWeaknessSurgeryQuadrantectomyRadiation therapyCraniotomyInternal medicineMastectomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Intracranial metastases from solid tumors are increasingly common, often brain or leptomeningeal metastases. Dural metastases are under-reported, present diagnostic and therapeutic challenges, and may mimic subdural hematoma or meningioma. This report describes 4 recent patients with dural metastases from breast cancer. A 64 year old woman, without known cancer, had 5 months of increasing headaches, left weakness, and focal seizures. Imaging showed an enlarging right frontal extra-axial enhancing mass with edema, initially thought to be a meningioma. At surgery the tumor involved overlying bone, replaced the dura, and invaded brain. Pathology was metastatic adenocarcinoma, ER/PR positive and Her-2 negative. Investigations showed a right breast primary, and lung and bone metastases. She received cranial radiotherapy (RT), letrozole and pamidronate. The tumor remains controlled after 42+ months. The 3 other patients all had prior known breast cancer, 2 ER/PR positive and Her-2 negative, and 1 triple negative (ER/PR/Her-2 negative), ages 45-70 years. Two had known systemic metastases prior to neurological presentation. Presenting symptoms included headache, seizures, focal weakness, and confusion. All had new or progressive systemic metastases, including bone, at diagnosis of dural metastases. None had intraparenchymal brain metastases. Two had resection of dural metastases, 1 with complicated postoperative course, with eventual improvement in both. Two received cranial RT, 1 refused RT, and all received hormonal therapy or chemotherapy, with initial clinical or MRI intracranial control for 6+, 7+ and 9 months. One patient had a small, asymptomatic dural recurrence 9 months after initial diagnosis, with new chemotherapy planned, and remains clinically well 11+ months after diagnosis. These cases illustrate the complexity of dural metastases. Although patients often have extensive metastatic disease, treatment can improve symptoms and prolong survival.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-OncologySame topicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingFrench-language works237,207