Elasticity Based Scheduling Heuristic Algorithm for Cloud Environments
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cloud computing environments mainly focus on the delivery of resources, platforms, and applications as services to users over the Internet. Cloud promises users access to as many resources as they need, making use of an elastic provisioning of resources. The cloud technology has gained popularity in recent years as the new paradigm in the IT industry. The number of users of Cloud services has been increasing steadily, so the need for efficient task scheduling is crucial for maintaining performance. In this particular case, a scheduler is responsible for assigning tasks to virtual machines efficiently, it is expected to adapt to changes along with defined demand. In this paper, we suggest an elastic scheduler that is able to alter its focus based on the current requirements demanded by the cloud service provider and the user of those services. The Elasticity Based Scheduling Heuristic (EBSH) suggested is measured against the bio-inspired optimization algorithms such as Ant Colony Optimization (ACO) and Honey Bee Optimization (HBO). Also, a networking algorithm is used in this study, namely Random Biased Sampling (RBS). The presented EBSH shows superior performance because of its ability to adapt to changes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".