Canada : its religious prospects. An address delivered before the English Wesleyan Conference, at Manchester July 16, 1871.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PUNSHON kindness with which they had received and listened to the filial address which, as the representative of that Conference, lie had heen permitted to bring to them.He would fain on this occa- sion represent that Conference worthily, for his constituency was so vast, so intelligent, and so worthy of all possible honour, that they deserved representation of the ablest and of the amplest kind.He was painfully conscious that his task was too heavy for Ids powers, and bssides this consciousness, which was of itself sufficiently embarrassing, he was still further embarrassed by the circumstances which surrounded him, and by the presence in which lie was called upon to speak.He sup- posed the meeting to be, and indeed it was, a session of Confer- ence, but lie had only to look upward and sideward to discover that all the hearts before him did not throb beneath clerical vestments.Now there was a gravity of utterance befitting halls of legislation, and there was a freedom of utterance adapted to popular assemblies, which he was somewhat puzzled to know how to combine.The Canadian Conference sent to England last year a well-loved and eloquent representative, who dis- charged his duty, as his constituents thought, well, and, as gra- titude existed in Canada, and the Canadians were not afraid to express it, their Conference recently held told him so by formal resolution.One, however, of those unseen kings, kings of the tripod, who sat in judgment upon the sayings and doings of that
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.209 | 0.023 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".