MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract B31: The RhoGEF GEF-H1 is required for RAS oncogene-driven pancreatic cancer

2014· article· en· W2565251264 on OpenAlexaff
Jane Cullis, Dedi Meiri, Maria Jose-Sandi, Oliver A. Kent, Mauricio Medrano, Daphna Mokady, Ming‐Sound Tsao, Anne‐Claude Gingras, Robert Rottapel

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Cancer Research · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research InstitutePrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGuanine nucleotide exchange factorMAPK/ERK pathwayOncogeneCancer researchPancreatic cancerCancerSmall hairpin RNACell biologyBiologySignal transductionCell cycleCell cultureGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Cellular transformation by oncogenic RAS engages the MAPK pathway under strict spatiotemporal regulation by the scaffold protein KSR-1. Here, we find using a whole genome functional shRNA-based screen, that the guanine nucleotide exchange factor GEF-H1 plays a critical role in a positive feedback loop for the RAS/MAPK pathway independently of its RhoGEF activity. GEF-H1 acts as an adaptor protein, linking the PP2A B' subunits to KSR-1, required for the dephosphorylation of KSR-1 S392 and activation of MAPK signaling. GEF-H1 is required for the growth and survival of RASV12-transformed cells and pancreatic xenografts. GEF-H1 expression is induced by oncogenic RAS and is correlated with pancreatic neoplastic progression. Our results therefore identify GEF-H1 as an amplifier of MAPK signaling required for cell transformation and provide mechanistic insight into the progression of RAS-mutant tumors. Citation Format: Jane Cullis, Dedi Meiri, Maria Jose-Sandi, Oliver Kent, Mauricio Medrano, Daphna Mokady, Ming Tsao, Anne-Claude Gingras, Robert Rottapel. The RhoGEF GEF-H1 is required for RAS oncogene-driven pancreatic cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on RAS Oncogenes: From Biology to Therapy; Feb 24-27, 2014; Lake Buena Vista, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Res 2014;12(12 Suppl):Abstract nr B31. doi: 10.1158/1557-3125.RASONC14-B31

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Cancer ResearchSame topicCancer Genomics and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207