A Tensor-Based Big Service Framework for Enhanced Living Environments
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The rapid advances of information, computing, and communication technologies have led to significant enhancements to human living environments. Enhanced living environments (ELEs) encompass the coupling of information technologies (cyber), intelligent devices (physical), and human society (social) for enhanced quality of life. Together, these spaces are referred to as cyber-physical-social systems (CPSSs). For CPSSs to provide high-quality services, improved service frameworks are needed. The framework presented in this article includes a sensing plane, cloud plane, and application plane. In the sensing plane, the relationship of objects in every local CPSS is represented by a local tensor, which is cleaned and uploaded to the cloud plane. In the cloud plane, a global tensor is constructed by integrating all local tensors together. Next, the application plane provides the corresponding high-quality services. A case study using a typical CPSS smart home illustrates a simple application of the proposed service framework.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it