Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this article, I provide a critical feminist analysis of my experience in a public-private partnership of university, government, and industry in New Brunswick. The project served the economic interests of the partners, supported neo-liberal discourses framing the restructuring of public services in the province, and shaped and were shaped by dominant social relations of gender, race, and class. Although the intent of the partnership was to benefit students in the public school system, my analysis points to benefits for the project partners and larger economic, social, and political interests. Keywords: corporate partnerships, health education, alcohol education, gender Dans cet article, je propose une analyse critique feministe de mon experience au sein d’un partenariat public-prive reunissant le monde universitaire, le gouvernement et des gens d’affaires au Nouveau-Brunswick. Le projet servait les interets economiques des partenaires, souscrivait aux discours neoliberaux a l’origine de la restructuration des services publics dans la province et faconnait les relations sociales dominantes de genre, d’ethnicite et de classe sociale tout en etant faconnees par elles. Meme si le partenariat visait a aider les eleves du systeme d’enseignement public, mon analyse met en evidence les avantages du projet pour les partenaires ainsi que les interets economiques, sociaux et politiques en jeu. Mots cles : education en matiere de sante, education sur l’alcool, partenariats du gouvernement en matiere d’education, genre
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".