MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2565299518 · doi:10.1016/s1525-0016(16)32948-3

139. Development of a Therapy for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Using Either TALEN of Cas9 Proteins

2016· article· en· W2565299518 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel Agudelo, Joël Rousseau, Jacques P. Tremblay

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Therapy · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTranscription activator-like effector nucleaseGenome editingCRISPRCas9BiologyDystrophinDuchenne muscular dystrophyGeneticsExonGeneStop codonExon skippingMuscular dystrophyComputational biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a hereditary disease due to a mutation of the DMD gene located in the X chromosome. It is mainly caused by the deletion of one or more exons of the DMD gene, which changes the reading frame and results in a premature stop codon and a truncated and inactive dystrophin protein. Nowadays, genome editing by programmable endonucleases like TALENs or the CRISPR/Cas9 systems is a powerful method for developing a treatment for this type of disease. However, the use of DNA encoding these systems leads to a prolonged expression, which may increase the off-target activity of these nucleases. Despite the risk of integration into the genome hence increased probability of side effects, viral vectors remain the most effective delivery system for the nucleases and the sgRNA. The objective of this work was to develop a novel approach using purified TALEN proteins or Cas9 complex (Cas9 protein with crRNA and tracrRNA) for genome editing as potential treatment for DMD. TALEN proteins or Cas9 complex were transduced to generate double strand breaks (DSBs) in the dystrophin gene. Repair of this DSB by non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) could restore the normal reading frame of the DMD gene producing a functional dystrophin protein as already described for Becker patients (Koenig et al. 1989). To develop this approach, DNA coding for a pair of TALEN proteins targeting exon 54 of the DMD gene were engineered and cloned in the pet16b expression vector. The resulting TALEN proteins contained a His-Tag for purification purposes. The proteins were produced in bacteria and the TALEN-His-Tag proteins were purified using a Nickel column. The purity was analyzed by SDS-PAGE electrophoresis. The Cas9 protein, the crRNA and the tracrRNA were obtained commercially. To verify the cleavage activity of the programmable nuclease-complexes, the target genomic region including exon 54 was PCR amplified and the resulting amplicon was incubated with either the TALEN proteins or the Cas9 complex. Cleavage products were analysed by gel electrophoresis. Both types of proteins were able to cut 100% of the amplicons in vitro. The TALEN proteins or the Cas9 complex were tested in Hela IR8 and in human myoblast cell lines. The TALEN proteins were transduced with Cys-(Npys)-(d-Arg)9, Bioporter or the iTop delivery system (propanebetaine). The Cas9 complex was transduced with RNAiMax. The presence of DSBs was evaluated using the Surveyor assay. The Cas9 complex generated the expected cleavage products. These results are similar to those obtained when the plasmids coding for both systems were transfected. This indicates that the Cas9 complex could be used effectively to target a specific gene. In contrary, the TALEN proteins did not induce INDELs detectable by the surveyor assay. This could be due to an insufficient protein transduction. In conclusion, protein therapy using the CRISPR/Cas9 complex could be a promising approach to develop alternative treatments for genetic diseases. We are currently validating this approach in vivo using the hDMD mouse model containing the complete human DMD gene. (‘t Hoen et al. 2008).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.278
Threshold uncertainty score0.563

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular TherapySame topicCRISPR and Genetic EngineeringFrench-language works237,207