MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2565401497

Folklore and the Fantastic in Nineteenth-Century British Fiction

2010· article· en· W2565401497 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
James Reitter

Bibliographic record

VenueWestern Folklore · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFolklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFolkloreScholarshipLegendHistoryLiteratureTerminologyMythologyFolkloristicsClassicsArt historyArtPhilosophyLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Folklore and the Fantastic in Nineteenth-Century British Fiction. By Jason Marc Harris. (Hampshire, England: Ashgate, 2008. Pp. xii + 235, contents, preface, acknowledgements, footnotes, bibliography, index, $99.95 cloth.)Written for discerning academics familiar with folklore scholarship, Jason Marc Harris' Folklore and the Fantastic in Nineteenth-Century British Fiction offers a useful model for investigating folklore's role in literature, while providing commentary that justifies its presence in British texts of the era. The book is organized into nine chapters, including an insightful introduction that explains some of the basic concepts of folklore analysis and establishes the foundation of the author's study. Citing eminent scholars in the field, Harris establishes credibility rather quickly and the initial literature selected supports this momentum. Indeed, the first book mentioned is Wilkie Collins' The Woman in White, a supernatural mystery of great popularity and significance to the Victorians. Also mentioned are the Grimms, Sir Walter Scott, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, and Elizabeth Gaskell.Harris successfully strives to include the audience in his first chapter by defining recognized folklore terms (motifs, tale-types, legend, marchen, etc.) as well as his own terminology such as metaphysics in order to establish a theoretical strucuire for die scholarship that follows. This effort is appreciated, as many scholars of literature may not be entirely familiar with these idiosyncratic definitions.Harris also strategically incorporates headings. With emphasis through bold or italicized fonts, Harris makes clear distinctions between categories and subjects with headings. He concludes the chapter with an eye towards die remainder of the book with sections on ideologies and his own argument: what emerges [out of the duality between the cultural elite and the folk achieved by die incorporation of folklore into literature] is a self-conscious rhetoric containing both skepticism and superstition that displays die mind at odds, or rather in conflicted conversation with itself (35). This type of summary passage concluding each chapter is one of the many strengths of the book.Chapter Two, Victorian Literary Fairy Tales: Their Folklore and Function, is an enjoyable and insightful read, fueled heavily by previous scholarship. Harris is certainly not afraid to question some of that analysis - die continuation of which becomes a bit of a problem as the pages turn. He also does a superb job at distinguishing between folk fairy tales and literary fairy tales, creating a solid basis for future analysis, and proceeds to include sections on socio-economics, gender, didacticism, and hybridization. Some of the audiors discussed here are Oscar Wilde and Edith Nesbit, and Ford Maddox Ford - rather interesting and unexpected selections.In Harris' tfiird chapter on James Barrie and George MacDonald, the book takes a decisive turn. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.083

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.009
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWestern FolkloreSame topicFolklore, Mythology, and Literature StudiesFrench-language works237,207