Арабские источники по истории мамлюкского Египта в Берлинской коллекции рукописей
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The manuscript’s department of the Berlin State Library covers a wide range of different sources. Some of them are of particular interest. The article includes a description of unpublished anonymous work “A book of purls”. The first part of this Book is a brief history of Bahri sultans (1250-1382), in the second part one can find some practical legal advice, while the third is a panegyric, written especially for sultan Barquq (1382-1399). An ingenious urjuza on the mamluk sultans was composed by Shams al-Din Khatib in the period of rule of sultan Barsbay (1422-1438) and then continued by a nephew of Shams al-Din Khatib, Muhammad al-Ba‘uni in two more ur juza’ s. The “threlogy” is an autograph of Muhammad al-Ba‘uni, written in the third quarter of 16 th century. In a work titled “The sun of Magrib” of Badr al-Din al-Damimini (1362-1425) there are copies of documents and letters giving some information not mentioned in well-known chronicles. Some treaties on furusiyya are described and partly translated. The most important ones are unpublished texts, which have not been studied before.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.035 | 0.013 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".