MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Differences of Somatic Mutations and Gene Expression in Blasts of Transient Leukemia and Acute Myeloid Leukemia of Down Syndrome

2014· article· en· W2565471235 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jian Chen, Fouad Yousif, Tim Beck, John D. McPherson, Johann Hitzler

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Cancer ResearchOntario Institute for Cancer ResearchHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGATA1Myeloid leukemiaLeukemiaclone (Java method)Exome sequencingCancer researchMyeloidBone marrowBiologyDown syndromeMutationMedicineHaematopoiesisImmunologyGeneGeneticsStem cell

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Transient leukemia (TL) occurs in 30% of newborns with Down syndrome (DS) and typically resolves spontaneously. Approximately 20% of infants with TL go on to develop acute myeloid leukemia of DS (DS-AML) within the first four years of life. The blasts of both TL and DS-AML harbor somatic mutations of GATA1 . The objective of this study was to identify additional genetic events, which associated with the progression of TL to DS-AML. Methods: Leukemic blasts of TL, DS-AML and normal T lymphocytes were sorted from blood and bone marrow samples of five patients who successively developed both disorders. In addition, blasts of one patient with subsequent relapse of DS-AML were analyzed. Mutational spectrum and gene expression and were determined by exome sequencing and RNASeq (Illumina HiSeq2000). The presence of mutations, which were identified with this approach in DS-AML blasts, was examined by droplet digital PCR in TL blasts (BioRad QX200). Results: Blasts of TL overall harbored fewer mutations than those of DS-AML. Mutations of cohesin and RAS pathway genes were identified in a subset of DS-AML but not TL. In the patient who developed a relapse, different cohesin gene mutations were detected at initial diagnosis of AML and relapse; a minor clone present at initial diagnosis of AML emerged as the predominant clone at relapse. Concordant somatic GATA1 mutations were present in both TL and DS-AML blasts derived from the same patient. In contrast, other genetic events, which were detected in DS-AML blasts by exome sequencing, were confirmed to be absent in TL (by droplet digital PCR). The majority of differentially expressed genes showed higher expression levels in blasts of TL compared to DS-AML. They included genes encoding chemokines and related to IL1 and TGFb signaling. Conclusions: The pathogenic sequence starting with TL and culminating in AML is uniquely initiated in children with DS by somatic mutation of GATA1. In contrast, the events associated with the transformation of TL to DS-AML resemble progression factors also found in non-DS AML. These progression events were not detectable even in minor subclones of TL suggesting they are acquired after the onset of TL. This research was supported by funding from the Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute and Ontario Institute for Cancer Research. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research→French-language works237,207→