Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This is the first of what was originally conceived to be twenty-five special volumes of the Journal of Macrodynamic Analysis.The volumes were to be a distinctive unit, the distinctiveness being related to the efficiency of the new science that is being advocated by this endeavor.The original plan was ambitious and indeed strained the capacity of those involved in the project.It would be quite foolish of me to attempt any compact presentation here of either the science or the novelty of its anticipated efficiency. 1 The presentation 2 would have been effectively seeded by the twenty-five volumes, and the external efficiency grounded through the programs generated by the contents of the eighth, sixteenth, twenty-fourth and twenty-fifth volumes in the series. 3 As it stands the scaled-back project will produce four volumes.The first volume is my own effort to in functional research.Subsequent volumes will reveal the fledgling 1 The key profound simple text relevant here is line 16 of Lonergan's Topics in Education, CWL 10 (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1993), 160: "it is quite legitimate to seek in the efficient cause of the science, that is, in the scientist, the reason why a science forms a unified whole."This, luminously ingested, shifts all particular sciences into a radically new context of functionality, and it obliges the seeker of an integral heuristic to reach for and articulate a pragmatics of its achievement.My best effort so far (see note 4 below) is "Arriving in Cosmopolis" (available in my site archives) where I suggest 9011 AD as a hopeful date of operative global identity.The essay is also available in Spanish.See "Llegando A Cosmpolis" on the same webpage.2 Presentation has a complex of tricky meanings related, e.g., to the contexts pointed to in notes 1 and 4. Another twist on it is provided by Philip McShane, Method in Theology: Refinements and Implementations, chapter 10, "Metaphysical Equivalence and Functional Specialization."The task of the twenty-fifth volume in the series is to tackle the heuristics of ultimate communal multi-creed ('in the far ear,' 'sans creed': see the conclusion of chapter six, "Total Process," of my site Book, Process: Introducing Themselves to Young (Christian) Minders.See the text at note 12 below.3 I note that the numbers given above to the volumes correspond to the numbers of the twenty-five seminars to which they are related.They may not correspond to the numbers of the eventual volumes of JMDA.The twenty-five seminars, begun in January of 2011, run at the rate of four per year until Spring 2017.The goings-on of the seminars and its members can be found on SGEME blog archive.Articles of members will be found either there or as part of the FuSe Series.]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it