MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2565600008

Хладагенты и хладоносители систем кондиционирования воздуха

2015· article· ru· W2565600008 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
А А Никитин, Т В Рябова, А В Василенок, В А Павловская

Bibliographic record

VenueНаучный журнал НИУ ИТМО. Серия «Холодильная техника и кондиционирование» · 2015
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldEngineering
TopicRefrigeration and Air Conditioning Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRefrigerantRefrigerationCoolantOzone layerChlorofluorocarbonFlammabilityEnvironmental scienceMontreal ProtocolProcess engineeringChemistryThermodynamicsHeat exchangerEngineeringOzoneOrganic chemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Considerated are the main mean of refrigerants and coolants in air conditioning and refrigeration equipment. Also considered the standard set by international organizations for designation to refrigerants. Are considerate the classification of refrigerants impact on the ozone layer of the Earth, which was proposed by the Montreal Protocol in 1987. Classification implies three main groups of refrigerants: chlorofluorocarbons, hydrochloric fluorocarbons, hydrofluorocarbons. Are described and presented basic properties of refrigerants in table: composition, the potential depletion of the ozone layer and global warming, temperature glide and flammability. Are described the basic meaning of the temperature glide based on PI diagrams real azeotropic refrigerant R22 and zeotropic R407C. Are designated classification coolants for their intended purpose, state of aggregation, operating temperature range, freezing point? The final table are summarized the freezing point of aqueous solutions of refrigerants depending on their concentration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.735
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0050.002
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueНаучный журнал НИУ ИТМО. Серия «Холодильная техника и кондиционирование»Same topicRefrigeration and Air Conditioning TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207