MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2565606062 · doi:10.1182/blood.v110.11.734.734

Efficacy of Dasatinib in Patients with Chronic-Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia with Resistance or Intolerance to Imatinib: 2-Year Follow-Up Data from START-C (CA180-013).

2007· article· en· W2565606062 on OpenAlexaff
Richard M. Stone, Hagop M. Kantarjian, Michele Baccarani, Jeffrey H. Lipton, Timothy P. Hughes, Rana Ezzeddine, Eric Bleickardt, Andreas Hochhaus

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDasatinibImatinibMedicineChronic myelogenous leukemiaInternal medicineImatinib mesylateGastroenterologyPharmacologyOncologyLeukemiaMyeloid leukemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Dasatinib (SPRYCEL®) is 325-fold more potent than imatinib against BCR-ABL in vitro and binds to BCR-ABL in both the inactive and active, oncogenic conformations. Dasatinib has been shown to be an effective treatment option for patients with imatinib-resistant or -intolerant chronic-phase chronic myelogenous leukemia (CP-CML). Here we report the extended follow-up of START-C, a 75-center, international study of dasatinib in 387 patients with CP-CML with resistance (n=288) or intolerance (n=99) to imatinib. Recruitment took place from February to July 2005. Dasatinib was administered on a 70-mg BID regimen; dose escalation (90 mg BID) or reduction (50 or 40 mg BID) were allowed for lack of response or toxicity, respectively. Median time from diagnosis of CML was 61 mo (range 32–50). Prior therapy included interferon-α in 65% of patients and stem-cell transplantation in 10%; 55% had received prior imatinib doses >600 mg and 53% treatment with imatinib for >3 years. Best response to prior imatinib therapy was complete hematologic response (CHR) in 82%, and complete (CCyR) and partial cytogenetic response (PCyR) in 19% and 18%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 15.2 mo, CHR was attained in 91% of patients (95% CI 87–93%), major cytogenetic response (MCyR) in 59% (95% CI 54–64%) (52% imatinib-resistant, 80% imatinib-intolerant), and CCyR in 49% (40% imatinib-resistant; 75% imatinib-intolerant). For patients with no prior MCyR to imatinib, 42% achieved a MCyR with dasatinib. A MCyR rate of 59% was recorded for patients with baseline BCR-ABL mutations; responses were seen across all mutations with the exception of T315I. MCyRs were durable, with only 7 of the 230 patients who had achieved a MCyR with dasatinib losing this response. Major molecular response rate (ie, a BCR-ABL/ABL ratio of <0.1% according to the international scale by RQ-PCR) at 12 mo was 25%. Progression-free survival at 15 mo was 90% while overall survival was 96%. Dose interruptions were required for 87% of patients and dose reduction for 73%; the average daily dose administered was 101 mg (range 11–171). Reports of grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia and neutropenia were documented for 48% and 49% of patients, respectively. Non-hematologic toxicity consisted primarily of diarrhea (37%), headache (32%), fatigue (31%), and dyspnea (30%). Pleural effusion was experienced by 27% of patients; this was categorised as grade 1–2 in 21% and grade 3–4 in 6%. Dasatinib-induced cytogenetic responses remain durable in patients with CP-CML resistant or intolerant to imatinib. Updated analyses corresponding to a minimum follow-up of 2 years on all patients will be presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.173
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicChronic Myeloid Leukemia TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207