Parkin‐Mediated Mitophagy in Skeletal Muscle with Aging and Exercise
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In skeletal muscle, the progressive age‐related loss of muscle mass and strength is known as sarcopenia. Alterations in skeletal muscle mitochondria are considered to be a contributing factor in this process. When mitochondria are no longer able to sustain the energetic requirements of the cell, selective autophagy (mitophagy) pathways are induced to promote the clearance of damaged mitochondria. In aged muscle, dysfunctional mitochondria generate increased amounts of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and can impair quality control mechanisms that facilitate their removal. It remains unclear if mitophagy mediates this reduced response in aged muscle. Parkin is an ubiquitin ligase involved in mitophagy, but little is known about its function with aging. To evaluate mitophagic signaling in aged muscle, young (3 months) and aged (18 months) Parkin deficient (KO) mice and wild‐type (WT) animals were assigned to three groups: control, acute exercise, or acute exercise plus 2 hours of recovery. Muscle mass was reduced by 46% and 65% respectively in aged Parkin KO and WT mice when compared to their young counterparts. Furthermore, aged WT animals displayed a 25% decrease in whole muscle cytochrome c oxidase activity. This was accompanied by a 40% reduction in State 3 (active) intermyofibrillar mitochondrial respiration in aged WT animals. In response to exercise, both aged Parkin KO and WT mice exhibited ~30% declines in running performance, and increased lactic acidosis by 2.1‐ and 1.4‐fold, respectively. Interestingly, basal mitophagy flux and subsarcolemmal mitochondrial localization of LC3II, p62 and ubiquitin were augmented in both young and aged Parkin KO muscle. Acute exercise increased mitochondrial flux in young animals, but reduced flux in older muscle. Our findings indicate that the expression of mitophagy proteins and their localization to mitochondria are not decreased in aged muscle, even in the absence of Parkin. However, attenuation of exercise‐induced mitophagy in response to aging may contribute to mitochondrial accumulation and dysfunction in aged muscle. Support or Funding Information Supported by NSERC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".