MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Endoglin Identifies the First Wave of Hematopoietic Progenitors During Embryogenesis.

2010· article· en· W2565738506 on OpenAlexaff
Luciene Borges, Michelina Iacovino, June Baik, Tim Mayerhofer, Michelle Letarte, Rita C. R. Perlingeiro

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEndoglinHemangioblastBiologyHaematopoiesisYolk sacProgenitor cellCell biologyEmbryoEmbryonic stem cellPopulationImmunologyCD34Molecular biologyStem cellGeneticsGeneMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 1600 Endoglin (Eng), an ancillary receptor for several members of the Transforming Growth Factor (TGF)-beta superfamily, plays a critical role in early development. Eng-/- embryos dye around 10.5 dpc due primarily to vascular and cardiac abnormalities. Yolk sacs (YS) of 9.5 dpc Eng-/- embryos present abnormal vasculature and anemia. However, the mechanism by which endoglin leads to an anemic phenotype is unclear. Using in vitro differentiation of Eng-/- ES cells, we have previously demonstrated that endoglin is required for proper hemangioblast and primitive hematopoietic development. To test the hypothesis that endoglin might have a direct effect on blood formation, here we investigated the role of endoglin during hematopoiesis in vivo. We first evaluated YS from 9.5 dpc Eng-/- embryos and observed significantly reduced numbers of hematopoietic colony-forming cells (CFCs), in particular GEMMs and BFU-Es, when compared to both Eng+/− and Eng+/+ embryos. Real-time PCR analysis revealed decreased expression of embryonic globin, Gata-1, and SCL in the mutant YS. We then investigated the function of endoglin in wild-type mice by sorting the endoglin positive and negative population from E7.5 to 9.5 CD1 mouse embryos. When cultured on the stromal cell line OP9 in the presence of hematopoietic cytokines, only cell cultures derived from the Eng+ fraction gave rise to hematopoietic progenitors, as evidenced by colony assays and FACS analyses. Engneg cells did not produce any hematopoietic colonies. We then separated cells into 4 fractions using Eng and Flk-1, and found that from E7.5-9.5, the hematopoietic progenitor activity resided in the Eng+Flk-1+ double-positive fraction. FACS and microarray analyses of the 4 fractions in E7.5 embryos demonstrated that the Eng+Flk-1+ fraction highly expresses both endothelial and hematopoietic markers, including VE-Cadherin, Tie-2, PECAM1, Gata-1, SCL, and Lmo2, indicative of hemogenic endothelial potential. Taken together, our findings demonstrate that endoglin marks the first wave of hematopoietic progenitors during development, pointing to a defined role for endoglin in the specification of YS hemogenic endothelium as early as E7.5, in addition to its well defined role in vascular branching and remodeling. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research→French-language works237,207→