MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2566058335 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2015-5270

Abstract 5270: IDH mutation status and role of WHO grade and mitotic index in overall survival in grade II-III diffuse gliomas

2015· article· en· W2566058335 on OpenAlexaff
Adriana Olar, Khalida Wani, Kristin Diefes, Lindsey Heathcock, Hinke van Thuijl, Mark R. Gilbert, Terri Armstrong, Erik P. Sulman, Daniel P. Cahill, Jaap C. Reijneveld, Bauke Ylstra, Pieter Wesseling, Kenneth Aldape

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreOntario Institute for Cancer Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsocitrate dehydrogenaseHazard ratioIDH1Mitotic indexConfidence intervalInternal medicineGliomaBiologyOncologyMutantPathologyGastroenterologyMedicineCancer researchMitosisGeneticsGeneEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Diffuse gliomas are up till now graded based upon morphology. Recent findings indicate that isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation status defines biologically distinct groups of tumors. The role of tumor grade and mitotic index in patient outcome has not been evaluated following stratification by IDH mutation status. To address this, we interrogated 558 WHO grade II-III diffuse gliomas for IDH1/2 mutations and investigated the prognostic impact of WHO grade within IDH-mutant and wild-type tumor subsets independently. The prognostic impact of grade was modest in IDH-mutant [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.21, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.91-1.61] compared to IDH-wild type tumors (HR = 1.74, 95% CI = 0.95-3.16). Using a dichotomized mitotic index cut-off of 4/1000 tumor cells, we found that while mitotic index was significantly associated with outcome in IDH-wild type tumors (log-rank p<0.01, HR = 4.41, 95% CI = 2.55-7.63), it was not associated with outcome in IDH-mutant tumors (log-rank p = 0.471, HR = 1.10, 95% CI = 0.80-1.51), and could demonstrate a statistical interaction (p<0.01) between IDH mutation and mitotic index. Patient age, an established prognostic factor in diffuse glioma, was associated with outcome only in the IDH-wild type subset, and consistent with prior data, 1p/19q co-deletion conferred improved outcome in the IDH-mutant cohort. These findings suggest that stratification of grade II-III gliomas into subsets defined by the presence or absence of IDH mutation leads to subgroups with distinct prognostic characteristics. Further evaluation of grading criteria and prognostic markers is warranted within IDH-mutant versus IDH-wild type diffuse grade II-II gliomas as independent entities. Citation Format: Adriana Olar, Khalida Wani, Kristin Diefes, Lindsey Heathcock, Hinke van Thuijl, Mark Gilbert, Terri Armstrong, Erik Sulman, Daniel Cahill, Jaap Reijneveld, Bauke Ylstra, Pieter Wesseling, Kenneth Aldape. IDH mutation status and role of WHO grade and mitotic index in overall survival in grade II-III diffuse gliomas. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 5270. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-5270

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→